Ordo Templi Satanis

What is Satanism?

It should always be remembered that LaVey's Satanic Bible, 

and in particular, his "Nine Satanic Statements", are extremely 

significant in the understanding of modern Satanic philosophy. 

"Satan represents..." various things in the Statements, but it is 

the whole idea that Satan represents these things, rather than 

existing as a material and personal entity, that forms one of the 

cornerstones of Satanism. Satanists do not believe in a literal 

Satan. We use the figure of Satan as a convenient symbol, an 

archetype, if you will, representing those things that Satanists 

believe in. Chief among these are intellectual curiosity, person-

al liberty of action, and physical indulgence. These three things 

are Satanism's goals, and we should never lose sight of them.



It is the aspect of Prometheus that we turn to to represent 

the first goal of Satanism; intellectual curiosity.  It was 

Prometheus who, according to the myths of the ancient Greeks, 

stole the secret of fire from the gods and gifted it to mankind. 

For this act, he was chained to a boulder and set upon by giant 

vultures which ripped out his liver every day (which subsequently 

regrew). This is a representation of the inherent suspicion with 

which science in particular, and change in general, is viewed by 

the masses. The masses are content with things as they are; they 

revel in the comfortable, the familiar, the easy. It is the 

Satanist who strives for the betterment of his condition, and is 

never satisfied with the status quo. Stagnation is the bane of 

the Satanist; change is the greatest fear of the masses. Therein 

lies the ultimate basis for the overwhelming fear of the Satan 

figure; change is seen as ultimately evil, and thus so too are 

those that strive for change.



The term "personal liberty" has taken on many different 

connotations in recent years, both social, political, and econom-

ic. The Satanist should see these three areas for what they are; 

mere facets of the same gem. The most basic idea of personal 

liberty states that the individual is responsible enough to take 

care of his own life, and should do so with an eye towards mini-

mally impacting the lives of others without their consent. This 

idea, which seems so simple and universal on the surface, is 

fraught with dangers. The greatest of these dangers, and ironi-

cally the one rarely (if ever) mentioned in these modern times, 

is the fact that the masses are, in fact, not responsible enough 

to govern their own lives! In fact, being the sheep that they 

are, the masses have proven, time and time again, that they do 

not want to be saddled with the responsibility of their own 

governance. The masses would prefer to follow rather than lead. 

And yet, ironically, as they yearn and demand persons of strong 

will to give their lives direction and meaning, they simultane-

ously complain about their lot, bemoaning the lack of control 

they exercise over their own lives! The reason for this is clear, 

and demonstrates that the masses practice the Satanic Sins on a 

regular basis. It is because the masses are engaged in a constant 

campaign of self-deception. Consciously, they clamor for self-

direction and power over their own lives, while subconsciously, 

they crave to be controlled.



The Satanist, on the other hand, exhibits a behavior 180o 

from that shown by the masses. The Satanist, seeing the mediocri-

ty around him, desires nothing more than to truly live his life 

free from the interference and petty controls of others. Does 

this mean that all Satanists are misanthropes, more suited to the 

life of a hermit? Not at all. However, the Satanist truly has the 

desire to free himself from the shackles with which the masses 

have bound themselves.



It has been said that most of history's greatest leaders, 

those with the most profound influence on the course of history, 

have been Satanists in all but name (and perhaps, say some, in 

name as well as deed!). This is an extension of the Satanic 

impulse to rule over one's own destiny. It just so happens that 

one of the easiest ways to do that is to control the destiny of 

others as well. Power, then, is not an end in itself to the 

Satanist, whether it is power over a single individual or power 

over an empire spanning continents. Power, in the sense of being 

able to have others follow your own Will, is merely a means to 

achieve the second Satanic goal-- freedom of action.



This may seem to be a selfish attitude, and it is. It should 

be remembered that the Satanist does not waste compassion, or 

empathy, on those who are undeserving. If the vast majority of 

the population-- the Masses-- can be efficiently and effectively 

turned into a tool to serve the ends of the Satanic Magician, 

then so be it. In fact, the Satanist is actually doing them a 

favor by providing them with the guiding force of a strong Will 

which they so desperately crave! Satanists should follow the 

example of Ayn Rand and see selfishness for a virtue, not a vice.



Lastly, the Satanist sees physical indulgence, the gratifi-

cation of the flesh, as one of the three chief goals of life. The 

reasons for this are many, but when it comes down to it, Satan-

ists see physical indulgence as the good thing it is. According 

to the paradigm of Darwinian evolution, higher forms of life have 

evolved mechanisms to condition their own behavior; stimulation 

of the brain's pain centers by actions which are self-destructive 

and stimulation of the brain's pleasure centers by actions which 

lead to the benefit of the species or individual. By seeking out 

those activities which are in themselves pleasurable, Satanists 

are merely acting according to our material natures; following, 

as it were, the rules set down by natural evolution.



This concept of physical indulgence can be seen to include 

not only the gross physical pleasures, such as stimulating sexual 

relations, eating of fine foods, and the like, but also the more 

subtle, psychological pleasures of life as well. There are those 

for whom the crafting of a piece of art is as pleasurable experi-

ence in and of itself as sex is for another. The act of creation, 

for the former individual, satisfies his sense of pleasure. As 

such, such activities are just as valid, for that individual, as 

engaging in sex would be for the latter individual. 



There can come times when the desires for pleasure of two 

individuals can come into direct or oblique conflict. Wherever 

possible, such conflicts should be resolved to the satisfaction 

of all involved. Many times, however, this is not the case. An 

example is the last piece of cake sitting on the dining room 

table. Two people are seated there, and each wants the cake. What 

is to be done? Ideally, the cake should be split between them, 

but this is not always a possibility. It is in such situations 

that Lex Talonis, the Law of the Jungle, must prevail. 



Does this mean that every minor disagreement between indi-

viduals should be settled by physical violence? Hardly. However, 

there are other, more subtle forms of conflict, that are used 

every day in the world, and which fulfill the dictates of Lex 

Talonis. To continue the above example, the former individual 

could attempt to plead, or wheedle, or threaten to obtain the 

cake. The latter individual might play on sympathy, or call in 

old implied indebtedness, or even rely on physical swiftness to 

get the piece of cake. Any one of these methods, physical or 

mental, demonstrates the ability of one individual to get what he 

wants, regardless of the actions or wishes of another individual. 

And that, in essence, is what Lex Talonis is all about. Getting 

what you want. Through physical or mental (or magical, for that 

matter) means, is all that matters. It is the ends that are 

important when discussing the Lex Talonis, not the means.



There are those that would say that such an attitude, taken 

by the population of a nation, would lead to sudden and destruc-

tive anarchy. This is probably true. But this comes once more to 

the idea stated above-- the masses are not capable of handling 

the responsibility of running their own lives, regardless of how 

loudly they protest. It is only the Satanist (in name or merely 

in fact) who possesses this ability. The Satanist would possess 

the self control, the direction over his own Will, to know how 

far to push for a given goal. The Satanist would even, perhaps, 

let another win a series of little battles of will, skirmishes as 

it were; saving up a growing tally of intangible debts to use 

against that individual for something down the road that is truly 

important.



There are certain assumptions that may be drawn from these 

statements. Obviously, there is a veil drawn between two segments 

of the population. The vast majority belong to the Masses; they 

are the followers, the enviers of those who accomplish, they are 

the drones. There also exists a distinct minority, but it is this 

minority which is responsible for the creativity, accomplishment, 

and advancement of culture. They are the doers, the leaders, the 

Satanists.