Date: | September 5, 1999 |
Version: | 1.2 |
Author/Editor: | Balanone |
Copyright: | 1997, 1998, 1999, Temple of Set |
This is one man's FAQ document concerning the Temple of Set. Its information is drawn from a number of resources, including electronic discussions, hard copy correspondence, internal Temple of Set documents, etc.
This FAQ's answers are intentionally brief and concise, sometimes excessively so, to keep this document's size down. More detailed information is available in the companion document, Balanone's Temple of Set REF.
Qualifications: Balanone has been an active member of the Temple of Set since early 1976, and so is intimately familiar with Setian philosophy and practice. While this document is just one person's statement, and not an official statement from/by the organization, this person has the depth of experience to be reasonably confident in his accuracy. Corrections, additions, and differences of opinion from other members of the Temple of Set are more than welcome, and within reason all such will be included in this document.
Revision history: See Balanone's
Temple of Set FAQ/REF Changes.
1.0 | Introduction |
2.0 | Philosophy |
2.1 | Xeper |
2.2 | Initiation |
2.3 | Satanism |
2.4 | Left Hand Path |
2.5 | Metaphysics |
2.6 | Dogma vs Doctrine |
3.0 | Religion |
3.1 | The Temple of Set as a Religion |
3.2 | Set |
3.3 | The Gift of Set |
4.0 | Magic |
4.1 | Black Magic |
4.2 | Ritual Practices |
4.3 | Occult Studies |
5.0 | The Organization |
5.1 | Membership in the Temple |
5.2 | Relations with Other Organizations |
5.3 | Why the Temple of Set? |
5.4 | Our Reputation(s) |
5.5 | Pylons and Orders |
5.6 | The High Priest |
6.0 | Setians and Setianism |
6.1 | Activities |
6.2 | Setians |
6.3 | Why are we here? |
6.4 | Miscellaneous |
7.0 | Contact and Information |
7.1 | Formal and Official Contact |
7.2 | Informal Contact |
7.3 | Friendly and Neutral Others |
7.4 | Unfriendly Others |
7.5 | Getting More Information |
7.6 | Those Stories About Us |
8.0 | Miscellaneous |
8.1 | Miscellaneous Links |
8.2 | FAQ/REF Sources |
Initiatory means the ToS advocates self-advancement through a series of levels of self-knowledge and similar attributes.
Magical means that the ToS openly works with magic (non-scientific cause and effect), not stage magic.
Left Hand Path indicates that the path followed by Setians is one of concentration and refinement of the self, leading toward more and more individuality and more and more individualism, as opposed to the Right Hand Path goals of growing toward some outwardly determined standard.
A slightly more detailed introduction can be found in the REF.
![]() |
2.0 -- Philosophy2.1 -- XeperPerhaps the best discussion of Xeper available online is Magus Don Webb's, found at: http://www.xeper.org/pub/tos/xeper2.html. See the REF document for additional discussion. [March 30, 1998: This essay is now also available at http://www.bigfoot.com/~balanone/xeper2.html.]2.2 -- Initiation
That dedication to initiation, to the philosophy of Xeper, and to Set, is represented by our primary symbol, the Pentagram of Set (a point-down pentagram within a circle). To help our members identify each other so we can work together, and to help them identify which level of initiation has been achieved by each other, we wear this symbol on different colored medallions, normally worn on necklaces of some kind, at formal gatherings. There are six levels of initiation recognized
within the Temple of Set, each with its specific color medallion.
ft> I know some satanists would like to THINK they are pagan, but if this is the case, why the need to desacrate the Pentagram as they did the Cross? I know the pentagram is not central to all pagan beliefs, but there is still no need for this. All pagan faiths that I know of respect the symbols of other religions.Agreed. So why do you turn the holy and glorious Pentagram wrong side up? It's a symbol of dynamic balance, resting actively on one point. Why do you have to turn it over with its all-important balance point pointing meaninglessly up into the air? 2.3 -- SatanismIs the Temple of Set a Satanic organization?The Temple of Set as an organization was founded in 1975 by Dr. Michael Aquino, in San Francisco. Its initial membership came from the Church of Satan (that infamous "Satanic" organization of the carny Anton LaVey), composed of CoS members who felt there was something real and important about the magic they were exploring, and felt that Anton LaVey's antics of that year were in contradiction to their own experiences. The Temple of Set has grown a lot in scope and maturity in those twenty years. Because of this history, and because of the many antinomian pursuits followed by Setians, many people will call the Temple of Set "Satanic." Many Setians do, too, but not all. "Satan" is a name given to the Prince of Darkness, just like "Set" is a name given to the Prince of Darkness. However, "Set" is a name given by a religion which found Setian principles attractive and noble, and which honored the Prince of Darkness. "Satan" is a name given to the Prince of Darkness by Christianity out of fear and revulsion. The Christian Satan is a twisted bastardization of the true Prince of Darkness. "Satanism" is a term used by many to describe the Left Hand Path in the West. We are a proud part of the tradition of spiritual dissent, differing philosophically from the Church of Satan. Their take on the Left Hand Path is the Immanent Path wherein godhood is achieved by the worship of the carnal ego with no possibility of personal immortality save in some vague connection to the organic stream. We are followers of the Transcendental path, wherein person immortality is achievable by a strengthening of the idealized Self. In an increasingly post-Christian world, the term "Satanism" will become irrelevant. More discussion concerning the Temple of Set and Satanism can be found in the REF document. You may also be interested in essays concerning the Prince of Darkness provided by Balanone (The Prince of Darkness) and High Priest Don Webb (Concerning our Patron). 2.4 -- Left Hand PathThe Left Hand Path is the tradition of spiritual dissent. It is a process of using the ideas and actions of the Seeker to create or realize an immortal, individual, potent, and powerful essence that will survive death. The Left Hand Path is the quest for personal immortality, won by hard effort without grace of gods, even of our role model, Set.2.5 -- MetaphysicsThis section is included only in the REF document.2.6 -- Dogma vs DoctrineThe Temple of Set has no dogma, but it does have teachings. We're sometimes accused of having dogma because of these teachings.The REF document includes some discussion detailing the distinction I see between doctrine and dogma. There is some disagreement on this issue, primarily I believe because people use different definitions for dogma. For example, in reviewing a draft of this FAQ, Magus Don Webb, the High Priest, suggested I erred in my statement above: DW> Actually the Temple of Set does have dogma: |
![]() |
5.0 -- The Organization5.1 -- Membership in the TempleNote: Most of these sections are explored in more depth in the REF document.
Not to put the cart before the horse, but I do have one minor concern, how would an Initiate in a small town in North Carolina with some resources at his disposal for traveling to other places for contact with other Setians but probably without adequate resources to be able to make it to a normal pylon meeting should one be within a reasonable distance of his location (which there probably isn't) ever manage to have enough contact with a Priest of the temple to be reconized as an Adept?From: "Koyote", Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 (All of this is from the p.o.v. of a first degree Setian with little face to face contact due to where I am and my job hours- I work most on weekends.)From: "fun fear", Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998, As an isolated Setian, I had similiar concerns, but I must agree with Koyote. The Internet is a wonderful tool for contacting Priests and Priestesses, and as Koyote suggested, writing articles for _The Scroll of Set_ is equally rewarding. Also, there are several correspondence Pylons available.From: Balanone <Balanone@geocities.com>, Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 It's a challenge. That hypothetical Initiate would have to Work at it -- corresponding with as many Setians as possible at the I* and II* levels (for breadth of perspective) and with several members of the Priesthood. He would have to take responsibility for maintaining correspondences, for establishing new ones to replace old ones that move on, and for demonstrating to the Priesthood his level of knowledge, his activity and study, and his advancement, along Setian lines.From: Christopher Merwin, Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 As a Temple Initiate from a small town in North Carolina I think perhaps I can help you with some of your queries. Due to the widespread distribution of Temple members many Pylons are organized based around correspondence, with email and Pylon newsletters as the primary form of communication. In fact, due to the highly private and individualistic nature of most Setians this is our prefered means of communication. ... The ability for you to meet face to face with other Initiates is left completely up to you and the other Initiates involved. The largest obstacle to being a Setian in the Carolinas is the local attitudes toward other non-christian religions, which any intelligent and sensitive individual should be more than capable of handeling.
A few members are automatically expelled upon the completion of two years of membership during which they did not achieve the II°. There are surprisingly few of these to my mind, probably because the Executive Director and Priesthood do such a good job of screening applicants. Fewer members resign because they encounter something within the Temple
of Set which they don't like, and fewer still are expelled because they
prove to be incompatible with Setian philosophy or life.
A few people who leave the Temple of Set do apply to rejoin the Temple. Setians who have left the Temple of their own accord may be allowed to rejoin on a case-by-case basis. The Temple is not designed as a revolving door, but we do realize that may not have entered the Temple at a time conducive to their development. Those that left impersonally or on an amicable basis are usually welcomed back without hesitation. Those who caused problems during their earlier membership or after their departure are carefully examined before they are welcomed back into the Temple of Set.
As James F Foster wrote on Xepera-l: General rule of thumb- before complaining about something, ask yourself: "What am I doing to fix it?" If you aren't doing much on your behalf, why would anyone else?Second general rule of thumb: Before complaining about someone else's (lack of) performance, ask if there's a problem with the paperwork and if there's anything you can do to help. 5.2 -- Relations with Other OrganizationsBy its bylaws, the Temple of Set as an organization can have no formal relationships or ties with any other organization. Individual Setians, however, can work with or have dealings with other organizations and its members. There are two limitations: 1) an Adept II° of the Temple of Set cannot also be a member of another religious organization, and 2) no Setian may be a member of an organization which condones or takes part in the violation of society's laws to the detriment of society.That first limitation has often been a subject for discussion by people who don't understand it or who want clarification. One clarification I posted to alt.pagan in 1996 was, "The Temple of Set wouldn't care if a Setian chooses to participate in a Buddhist retreat, an Indian sweat lodge, a Thelemic Gnostic Mass, a Passover Seder, a Pagan circle, or whatever. Part of being an Adept Magician is being able to see and mesh with whatever magic is taking place, understanding the causes of the ceremony and participating in those causes as appropriate to our own Will. "However, if someone claimed to seriously believe in the wheel of karma, and that Xeper is valueless because until we can learn to avoid all participation in this world we're doomed to ride that wheel cycle after cycle, then yes, that religious belief would be opposed to the Setian principles of Xeper, and that person would not be able to remain a member of the Temple of Set. The two philosophies are simply incompatible." The REF document includes sections which examine our history regarding specific other organizations. 5.3 -- Why the Temple of Set?The REF document examines the question "What does the Temple of Set have to offer?"5.4 -- Our Reputation(s)Lupo the Butcher, in his "alt.satanism FAQ file", states/stated: "The most vocal of groups which border upon Satanism, is the Temple of Set of Michael Aquino and friends, which splintered away from the Church of Satan in a disagreement over monetary policy. They have a number of nasty habits, including the public publishing of names, addresses and workplaces of former members as a harassment tactic, disinformation regarding Satanic and occult groups, including their own, and a good deal of "we are the one true way" posturing."See the section on Satanism for a summary of the schism with the Church of Satan. We do not normally publish the name, addresses, or any other information concerning former members. We do not harass former members. Thousands of exmembers have left the Temple of Set for many different reasons, without any activity such as Lupo complains about. See the REF document for more information. 5.5 -- Pylons and Orders5.5.1 -- Pylons of the Temple of SetSetians who live in the same area sometimes organize a local pylon in which they can meet together regularly for discussions, study, ritual work, and other activities. See http://www.xeper.org/pub/tos/pylons.html for a good discussion of local pylons within the Temple of Set.In addition to local pylons, there are correspondence pylons which support the Xeper of Setians who wish to participate in group discussions and activities by correspondence. 5.5.2 -- Orders of the Temple of SetIV° Setians, Masters of the Temple, may found Orders within the Temple of Set. If you were to think of the Temple of Set as a college of higher learning, the Orders could be seen as departments within the school, each concentrating on specific flavors of exploration. They are places for the Adept to specialize in pursuit of the specialized tools for their personal achievement. Some Orders, like the Order of the Vampyre or the Order of the Trapezoid, are well known beyond the boundaries of the Temple walls, while others have lower profiles.The REF document includes more information, specifically concerning the Order of the Trapezoid. 5.6 -- The High Priest
|
![]() |
6.0 -- Setians and SetianismSetian is the generic term which applies to each member of the Temple of Set. Setians is the term which applies to two or more members, and to the entire membership together.Setianism is a term which can be applied to the Setian philosophy, the Setian religion, and/or the Setian way of life. Some (many?) Setians prefer the terms "Setian philosophy," "Setian religion," and "Setian way of life" over the term "Setianism." I find "Setianism" a convenient term to use when I am referring specifically to the Setian way of life, or to any combination of these ideas. 6.1 -- ActivitiesWhat do Setians do? This topic is covered in the REF document.6.2 -- Setians6.2.1 -- Specific Setians
6.2.2 -- Questions about SetiansAre Setians Pagans? That's a question which depends heavily upon your definition of "pagan." See the REF document for this discussion.6.3 -- Why are we here?"Here" may be any digital forum -- you may be reading this on a web site, a newsgroup, or FTP archive. I've tried to generalize the answer to apply to most situations. For that matter, "here" may also apply to Pagan gatherings, meetings in hotels, new age fairs, etc. These questions are examined in the REF document.6.4 -- MiscellaneousThere isn't much in this section, and it all resides in the REF document at this time. |
![]() |
7.0 -- Contact and Information7.1 -- Formal and Official Contact
Temple of Set P. O. Box 470307 San Francisco, CA 94147
See the REF document for comments concerning the Book of Coming Forth by Night, Crystal Tablet of Set, and other publications. 7.2 -- Informal Contact
7.3 -- Friendly and Neutral OthersThough I've often quoted from others' responses to frequently asked questions, still this document is just one person's compilation concerning the Temple of Set. Anyone who needs a more comprehensive view should contact one or more of the other Setians (above, or better through Xepera-l), and perhaps one or more people who aren't Setian. A few people who are active online, whose independent views concerning the Temple of Set at this time appear to be informed and reasonable, are listed in the REF document. Please note that neither I nor the Temple of Set have much influence over nor agree with everything these people say.7.4 -- Unfriendly OthersThe REF document identifies a few people whose messages, documents, or web pages you're likely to run into on the Internet, and who are biased against the Temple of Set for a variety of reasons.7.5 -- Getting More Information
There are copies of that letter floating around cyberspace, available
on various FTP sites and on BBSs. Unfortunately, most of them are out of
date, since the introductory letter is updated semi-regularly, and the
files on these unrelated sites aren't. The primary site known and guaranteed
to maintain a current copy is the WWW site maintained by a Priest of Set,
http://www.xeper.org. Versions in other
languages can be found there and also at http://www.dnaco.net/~raensept/.
Reference: mailto:webmaster@xeper.org Note: This is the only FTP site both managed by a Priest of the Temple of Set and dedicated to the Temple of Set at this time to our knowledge. The reliability of other FTP sites will be lower -- they will not be as accurate nor current. As other Setian sites are identified they will be listed at http://www.xeper.org (this is the original slopoke tree moved to funet) October, 1997: I could not find the Quartz/occult directory November, 1997: It appears that all files dealing with the ToS have been removed from this site because of their age. Reference: mailto://ftp@etext.archive.umich.edu (Paul Southworth) 7.6 -- Those Stories About UsDespite our general policy of keeping a low profile, sometimes rumors about us do get spread, generally by people who dislike or fear us for some reason (perhaps because so little is known about us, or simply because of our non-Christian belief system, or for other reasons). If anyone (perhaps someone else at a location of one of our formal meetings, or someone you meet on the 'net, or some other acquaintance) should ask you any of the following questions, it's good to be able to give them the correct answers.7.6.1 -- A Cult?"Is this a cult?" No. Some people may define "cult" to mean any non-Christian religion, and then yes, we don't believe in the Christian religion. But most people reserve the word "cult" to you mean something dangerous to society or its members, and no, we're not a cult since we are beneficial to our members, and we're not anti-social by any means.The REF document contains more discussion on this topic. 7.6.2 -- Satanists?"Are you Satanists?" A lot of people say yes, and a lot of people say no. A lot of Setians say yes, and a lot of Setians say no. See the REF document for this discussion.7.6.3 -- Naziism and FascismAre you fascists? Nazis? No. See http://www.bigfoot.com/~balanone/nazitrap.html or http://www.necronomi.com/magic/satanism/fascist.set.txt [as of July 6, 1998, the necronomi.com copy was not found online] for one member's discussion of this question.7.6.4 -- PresidioWhat about the Presidio stories?On August 14, 1987 CE the San Francisco home of Lilith and Dr. Aquino was raided by San Francisco Police officer Glen Pamfiloff on a search warrant obtained as a consequence of the accusations of Army chaplain Lawrence Adams-Thompson that the Aquinos had kidnapped and sexually abused his stepdaughter as part of the Presidio of San Francisco day-care witch-hunt. These claims were investigated in depth by the SFPD, the FBI, and the US Army CID. No charges were ever made in any jurisdiction, and the evidence has shown Dr. Aquino and Lilith Aquino to be innocent of any such activity. Full details can be read in the alt.pagan post, dated Sun Jun 02, 22:14, From : scratch@gladstone.uoregon.edu, Subj : Re: Curio courts the CAW. 7.6.5 -- Other Occultists
There's a little more discussion of this in the REF document.
We do enjoy companionship and camaraderie. At our various conclaves, many of us will gather in private rooms, local restaurants, and the hotel lobby, and we'll just talk for hours, about almost anything. Some of our people will even sometimes forget to go to sleep, being so wrapped up in talking to people they see only once or twice a year. We enjoy life, we enjoy growth, and we enjoy each other. If you spend
time with Setians, you'll find that most of us smile a lot, honest smiles,
reflecting the enjoyment we find in life.
7.6.6 -- The Setian IlluminatiThese topics are explored in the REF document. |
![]() |
8.0 -- Miscellaneous8.1 -- Miscellaneous Links
8.2 -- FAQ/REF Sources
|