|
|
Referring here to the pedastal on which HUMANS would put human consciousness (somehow, that's humorous). Neurology, a hard and strict science, has toppled that pedastal at least insofar as it can be congruently shown: OTHER MAMMALS, and not the ones with sonar whose brains are MORE complex. Animals are no different than humans. PERIOD. But let us look at something very different in structure and form (brain): the octopus. (OH SHUT UP, I mean the real creature). Very different brain. They can memorize more data than any human can and reassemble that data exactly if humans go and mess it up. They rebel in experiments which show that HUMANS are incapable of recognizing REBELLION when they see it! And so forth. I'm not going to belabor details and hog more more bandwidth. WHEN ELEPHANTS WEEP is a good STARTER, by J.M. Masson and S. McCarthy. SIMPLE to read for dummies. I already had my 2 cents to say about Sabella and Owenia, my two annelids. Guess it fell on deaf ears since I heard nothing about it. TISH. (OH! They're SO CUTE). HUG A YUGG. Bees, when deprived of their complex mode of communicating direction, resort to doing what humans do when they can't communicate to another humans due to language barrier: THEY POINT. DUH.
Gorillas don't make computers? Neither do African Pygmies, or Bushmen or Australian Aboriginies or...do you REALLY want to get into THIS, Tossers?? I don't, it's a moot point, BORING. FEW humans think up such things: ALL of them are natural AND creative (dionysian). In the past they ALL belonged to guilds (INCLUDING NEWTON). The rest of you learn by monkey see monkey do. Chimps don't drive cars? Neither does Diane Vera. Neither know HOW to. Diane could learn? Would she also have the required motor skills and quick reaction time needed? Chimps were taught to fly plains by the Defense Department AND FIRE BOMBS. So much for monkey see monkey do. Could a human as easily be taught to be dextrous swinging from and climing up trees? It is ALWAYS the dummies out there that WORSHIP this so-called human intelligence, but even as Diane pointed out, the KINDS OF HUMANS WHO CONCEIVE OF IT always do it in the CARNAL WAY, as Einstein did. These would-be APES of knowledge (who love to brag about this even so they personally LACK it) never know how this all came about. No: HUMANS don't create technology. SOME HUMANS do. MOST HUMANS CAN'T. I used to think it was a matter of education and sought to PROVE this and wound up proving the OPPOSITE of my own idea on it!
Tatars are notorious for NOT WANTING written words, tho they had them before and they have them again now, ho hum. Yet they DOMINATE in the Russian space-sciences. They have the LARGEST brains and HIGHEST IQ's. So much for literacy (one t). (Yes, I make typos when I type 120 wpm and don't proof it, but I DO NOT make spelling errors!)
Malleus Dangle Clack STUDIES sociology in a college: what's his excuse for being UNABLE to SYNTHESIZE DATA outside his own linear study (spaghetti thin reality tunnel) to form a picture; what's his excuse for being SO ABYSMALLY IGNORANT as to BIOLOGY. What the hell KINDS of anthropologists are colleges putting out these days? Talk about lowered standards. He doesn't know stuff I learned in HIGH SCHOOL. And when he takes the time to carefully write an almost-essay it's HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL obvious stuff. Anthropoid studies are, after all, SUPPOSED TO BE the scientific study of anthropoids. Yeah, right. Yawn. He thinks like what he LOOKS like: your typical geeky Born Again. Wow! He's found Jes..er, SET! Wide eyed, full of crusader spirit, as ignorant as the rest of his kind. YAWN. What is a nature god? I know what nature is. What is a nature god? Anyone know? Their SPECIES of human tend to think up strange wacky ideas like this, they even read them into texts when they aren't even HINTED of in the texts. It must be GENETIC with them: TO BE STUPID. GODS. Yeah, like Set. Musta been Ashteroth that threw that asteroid down what killed the nasty dinosaurs which allowed mammals to do diddly-squat. Let's do an Aquino-style etymology: ASTERoid must be ASHTERoth. Both come from the word ASTARA meaning heavenly body? DUH. Like what kinds of ideas are these? Are they even ideas? They are evidence of 99% humanoid IMBECILITY: not the types to invent techno-gadgets for sure. They invent RELIGIONS. And even DUMBER ones follow the religion!
Among Scandinavians the one member of the clan that could "read the runes" was considered a magician. The rest were illiterate. Yet the runes were nothing but an incomplete and superstitiously regarded GREEK script: from there to Etruscan to N. Italic and Black Sea and so forth. INGR BINGR (similar to unga bunga) What human intelligence? Where is it?
I manage to come up with a THEORY of evolutionary catastrophism based on living IN nature and inwardly KNOWING my own bodily form and a lot of other THEORIES and I'm NOT a paleontologist. Now it's accepted theory and KNOWN FACT! I manage to solve a mathematical problem and find a solution to ALL SUCH problems and my solution also solves a problem Fibonacci solved. NO ONE EVER used the method I used and Ph.D's can't figure out what I did. I SOLVED it and all SUCH problems (that's solving the greater equasion.) I have high-school math and forgot 90% of the stuff I learned since I never had to USE it. I solved it in a way that was NEVER taught to me or anyone else. That is INTELLIGENCE. NATURAL intelligence that I, a BEAST WITH BRAINS, have. Giving the same problem to MANY people with YEARS more math training than I, in order to prove "how EASY the problem was to solve" I manage to prove the converse: NONE of them could solve it. Few solved the MAIN problem, but none solved the bigger equasion. Yes, it blew my mind. SHOWING THEM how I did it? They didn't understand it. WOW! Are people THAT DUMB? I'm NO math wiz. At least, not compared to math wizards I KNEW when growing up. I consider myself quite average (AMONG MY OWN KIND) and I'm LAZY to boot, no incentive to BOTHER with it.
Suggested reading: an out of print book, practically ignored save for one mention by Desmond Morris (and he wrote a private letter to Prof. Hardy claiming he felt it was the RIGHT theory): THE AQUATIC APE by Elaine Morgan. FASCINATING book with additional chapters by hard-scientists which back this up. We don't need BONES to prove this (and bones would NOT prove it one way or the other). We have LIVING HUMANS with aquatic adaptions that one would only EXPECT TO FIND in other aquatic mammals. And yes, some of us have MORE of this than others! WHY do we have this? Obviously, the picture of HAIRY hominids doing the Tarzan thing is NOT a valid scenario. Morgan's book is a no-nonsense, to-the-point compilation of this, in SIMPLE terms with two chapters of the hard science at end of book.
Our human mode of "literacy" is in fact SO PATHETIC compared to the chemoreceptive mode that it's a JOKE to hear anyone brag about it. We use PURE ARTIFICE and what good is it when people LIKE HUNT, or BALANONE or AQUINO just DO NOT "get it" and may as well be speaking another language? Aquino does't even "get" the SIMPLE theory of evolution! I never even studied it and I came to the same WHOLLY ABSTRACT conclusion that a Ph.D. in physics (Lupo) came to.
According to the ESOteric oral history of certain Asian peoples, HUMANS evolved from something partly reptile and partly mammal. Since the oral tradition CRUNCHES this early portion into a mythopoetic form, it is hard for anyone outside to grasp this. Westerners TRYING come up with imagining that such humanoids lived and wrote down (in stone again eh?) stuff way way back. (DUMB westerners). NO. FACT: Sub-class Synapsida 345 to 280 MILLION years ago gave rise to THERAPSIDS, the mammal-reptiles which DOMINATED the Permian age 275 million years ago: BEFORE dinosaurs. Yes. 240 million years ago we had MAMMALS. Yes, BEFORE dinosaurs. Therapsids came into being along side the Archosaurs. By the time Archosaurs branched out and RULED the planet (dinosaurs) the Therapsids gave way to egg-laying and placental MAMMALS. They lived, small, scurrying like rats, all the 150 million or so years that dinosaurs ruled. They got smaller, lived in the dark and got smarter. If not for SET (the Q, you see) heaving that asteroid down on the earth and wiping the dinosaurs out, we wouldn't be here. I mean, does anyone believe that? Aside from Aquino I mean. Sure: you can't PROVE OR DISPROVE that someONE didn't do it: aliens, whatever. But to believe that some intelligence DID this is FAITH, NOT FACT OR SCIENCE. FACT, asteroid did crash and wipe out dinosaurs. As for Aquinos REDICULOUS Alven plasma universe steady state bunk, it's not controversial at all. It's worse or equavalent to Xian "Creation science." Iron atoms wouldn't form in plasma DUH. As in like what we got in blood? Plasma (my own idea here) would be ideal if it could be contained to GET RID OF WASTE: it would burn it down and reduce it to simple elements. So! The TOS and its IDIOTS don't harm anyone, EN DIANE? They perpetuate Chrestian benighted STUPIDITY like the Born Agains do. SAME KINDS of stupidity. HOW could ancient people of my culture KNOW about Therapsids? HOW? That stuff IS written down in places. HOW DID THEY KNOW when only moderns like Stephen J. Gould could CONFIRM it? But this isn't even NEW and LATEST stuff. Hunt should have learned this in HIGH SCHOOL where I learned it in the early 1960's. It was known back then. MORONS. Wayne Hill says I dignify the TOS with the comparison to what Fundies would do if they tried to claim they arose out of Atheism. The CORRECT view of TOS doctrine is equivalent to saying that honey bees and other incredibly intelligent insects (who truly DO rule this planet) were TINKERED with by Beelzebub whose real name is BEE El zzbbzzzzbbzzzbb. See. The fly-like "Q" from Star Trek (what, no more Mr. Spock or Sarek?). After all, ain't he the Lord of the FLIES? See, insects don't need an internet. They are chemoreceptive. They don't need an insect genome project because they can CHANGE their own genes and adapt FAST. What meager data Phil wrote in his article on Evolution and what half-assed "bees do trigonometry" Diane put on the inet is NOTHING compared to the real studies done on these creatures. WHY DOESN'T ANYONE KNOW IT? WISDOM has always been the PROPERTY OF US SATANISTS. Well, it still is OURS. NEOS? I don't know. Aquino can't even say something about the number Pi in his book without screwing it up. As per norm, he doesn't "get it." He doesn't "GET" anything. Harmless? He lies, tries to RIDE ON the coattails of the COS and poses as a Wise Satanist when he is a -demented- moron. And his people, UGH. They can't even THINK as well as the fundies think: AQUINO's daffynition of Satan as a literal being: that's the SHARED VIEW. SHARED BY WHO? Christians, that's who. They also share LOTS OF OTHER views about Satanists: PRESIDIO falls into the category well enough. That statement alone (to a mind that can THINK, Diane) IS HARMFUL. GET A CLUE dammit! GET OFF THE FENCE.
As to Diane Vera STILL bothering CoS people trying to push Setters on them with her new dismissal of ability to think and use foresight: "But they're harmless.". OH, so then are Xians harmless and weren't they harmless back then when they started out as a small cult? Sure they were. (If we only had a time machine, we say on HIND-sight). According to Aquino's FAQ something like this is presented (always using Websters). "Do Satanists believe in a literal being named Satan?" His answer would be that if "WE" accept the "shared view" of this (shared by whom? NOT Jews, NOT any other religion, ONLY CHRISTIANS) then yes, Satanists believe in a literal Satan or Devil." OH, the shared view of Satanists BY THE SAME PEOPLE who think we have a literal devil is that we sacrifice virgins, rape infants and so forth, you know, the DEBOO VIEW, one which this man used because his sexuality was hopelessly WARPED. Enter Presidio Mikey and Shambi. And of course, Mr. Webster. OH, MORONS don't harm anyone? TOS is harmless eh? DIANE VERA, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU? Cops are harmless too unless they get power. Wife abusers are harmless too unless a woman marries one. TOS perpetuates FALSEHOODS and makes traditionally WISE satanists look like MORONS. They stick that RETARDED Set shit everywhere. They make FALSE CLAIMS and RIDE ON THE BACK OF ANTON LAVEY. None of these people are harmless unless they pose as people with AUTHORITY or GET authority. Aquino's FAQ then: shared belief OF XIANS imagines we believe in literal devils: along with all the OTHER STUFF they believe we do.
Satanists, as a fact, were PREDOMINANTLY more in line with ATHEISTS and ONLY thought of a "Deity" idea in terms of a guiding force, same as LaVey. And LaVey KNEW THIS as he kept mentioning people (like Ben Franklin) who were ALL MASONS (Chopin, all of them, LaVey pointed a way without outright saying this).
The "SATANIC SCHOOL" defined by themselves has NEVER done this or believed this, and the COS presented the CORRECT view. Carducci and others are highly visible portions of this Satanic School. They aren't fundie xians posing as Satanists as IS the TOS. The TOS IS harmful in that its leader portrays himself as one of LaVey's old cronies and then presents the world with IMBECILITY worthy of a fundie. Their members are STUPID in the SAME WAY that Chrestians are stupid. Is that ENOUGH reason? The question is not why COSsers want NOTHING to do with Tossers OR fundies, the question is "what's WRONG with Diane Vera? What does she WANT?" She is a repressed fool and DEFINITELY NOT generational. She is evidently not COS material because she can't stand beasts with brains and tends to grate every one of them the wrong way. If she were a healthy animal with her scientific knowledge she'd have been LONG AGO brought into the fold: that's the way it works. So what's LEFT for her? TOS? OH, there's her conflict then: she knows they present FAIRY TALES and xian fundie beliefs, DUALIST mind-sets. Harmless? Encouraging people to attack a man at his job and giving one and all directions to the place and person is harmless? Trying to run people out of business is harmless? OK Diane. Then DATE RAPE is also harmless. Then males who believe women belong in the kitchen breeding their babies are also harmless. The "Family Values" groups out there are also harmless. Crying "FIRE" in a crowded theatre is also harmless. It's just "freedom of speech." How many times does a COS person in contact with this woman have to tell her that they DO NOT WANT Setters around them and DO NOT accept them? HOW MANY TIMES?
Personally I have always lived and behaved as if such things THAT YOU FEAR are really harmless as these things never bothered me or us or effected us in ANY way. Family Values and such existed in the 1950's. They didn't pertain to us or effect us in any way. Xtoids still got abortions (illegal ones) and they got them from guess who among other people. We STILL did our own thing. We don't tend to CARE what YOUR PEOPLE do. Or what President NIXON does, or Mrs. Nixon. GET IT?
You have four things now: Cos 9 statements (revised, fixed up) COS versus TOS, Neter and Phil's Evolution post to show you what's what. TOS is nothing but a part of the GREATER fundie xian movement. More, they do the work OF that movement against REAL satanists or at least the ones in the COS (they don't make a dent in us or bother us.) Think with your head woman, not with your congested twat. Maybe if ONE MORE Cos person complains about your bothering them, SOMEONE will plaster YOUR name and address all over the internet. You claim you don't want to be drafted into a war, and yet Karl's mother takes the phone from him and tells you "I love my son. DO YOU?" What are you DOING? You are trying to fuck with his head and failing. Yes, that was his MOTHER who did that. Recall: he fucked with YOUR head before. NOT the other way around. He just laughs at you. Watch it, woman. He's bigger than you.
Trying to alter what Anton LaVey originally was (and said and never deviated from) in order to purvey lies is EXACTLY what the Christians did with Jews and their traditions. ASK THE JEWS if Christians are harmful. Diane: Go eat some corn flakes.
Too chicken shit to read the e-mail? Want EVERYONE to read it instead? You see it as if there are these "really nice chumy" Tossers out there (FUNDIE XIANS) and these mean aloof and stubborn COS people that DO NOT WANT to shake hands with the Fundie TOSsers. And you fancy I'm some kind of town cryer saying this. HA! I'm saying it (relatively speaking) POLITELY. Let me translate that: COSsers would regard your mother (who you want to love) as GARBAGE, as a DOORMAT and NO, they'd NOT WANT TO KNOW HER, OR LIKE HER. They would not be ABLE to ever LIKE such a pathetic dead creature, a walking corpse. But the Tossers ARE JUST LIKE her. That is it. OWN UP or go eat your rice crispies. Get thee hence back to the whips and chains and crown of thorns in the church. We victimize victims alright when they PERPETUATE their own victimhood due to MASOCHISM. You belong to an INSANE fucking CRAZY race of people. Robots.
Look who you always like: DeBoohoo, Hunt, Balanone. And you WANT to
like mother dear. DAMN woman, you like the LOSERS and the IMBECILES and
you even HELP PROVE they are imbeciles. GET OFF the fucking fence. Everytime
you find another "harmless moron" to like, he's a dualist, an imbecile,
a pretender with no knowledge of anything, a faker. But you haven't found
YOURSELF yet. Meanwhile, you create havok where you go, rub Cossers the
wrong way, grate on them and they slap you around on the inet for the most
part. There are HEAPS of Cossers out there I hear from that know what's
on the inet but they don't GET ON the inet. HEAPS of them. I'm a TRUTH
SAYER in a Durga sense. YOU FEAR THAT! EVERYONE knows it! But if you keep
dallying around something and asking me FOR bullshit: I'll give you an
answer you deserve: BULLSHIT.