|
|
On a serious note and on something I wrote to Peter Smith for his information on MACHEN, a fiction writer who wrote quite a bit with KNOWLEDGE OF FACTS of "Serpent people" (tho he depicted us as non-humans in a kind of mythology he wrote of): I SHOWED HIM that "sixty stone" not alphabet, but SYLLABERY which happens to be REAL. I had this script in a copy I made myself of old scripts WE USED, tho we used them often as CODES of a sort. One COULD write in the script. I found out recently that MOST of these letters (I think they are 3 short) are IDENTICAL to what was recently found in the right area and known as LINEAR A or B!! So far, no one can read it! I gave Peter Smith the SOUNDS that go with each "letter" or syllable. From this, comes an EARLY "Boiboloth." There was also a later Boiboloth and one would have to know which to use based on a CODE put into any kind of "message." Such codes were VERY complex. Often a few letters WRITTEN HIGHER than other letters made a geometrical pointer to a LOCATION. That is, you can't read Crowley's message as REPRINTED by typewriter. You'd have to see the actual writing he did to decode it ALL and it is VERY complicated unless you have previous knowledge of what it says. A LONG time ago, someone showed me the actual written thing, a copy of it. I asked an old timer to try his hand at it and HE GOT as far as two words and said he didn't want to do more. "Social" and "Real" came out. This was a LONG time ago, the 1960's. The kid who asked me about this was NOT one of us, not from our neighborhood, but KNEW of us. I gave it back to him and never thought much more of it save to ask him if it was about buried treasure or money. NORMALLY such coded messages among us, that COULD BE decoded using our own methods, had EVERYTHING TO DO with MONEY hidden somewhere! YES!! I can see that NO ONE ever thought of that! Since 1990 and since I've been in touch with the PUBLIC neo-occult I've bumped into heaps of ex-xians and can't STOMACH most of the wannabes in this movement who know NOTHING: NOT EVEN what the REAL so-called MAGICAL tradition was all about (and it's NOT Crowley or Blavatsky or ANY of that CRAP). What do you think our so-called BIG SECRETS were anyway? GOD-SHIT? NO! NEWTON used code too, traditional code of another sort and I mean ISAAC NEWTON. This came out recently and some people in the sciences at least KNOW of it. To date, people who KNOW CHEMISTRY have only partially broken Newton's code!
Yet imagine if you knew NO CHEMISTRY? It would be IMPOSSIBLE to break. THESE were our BIG magical secrets: GUILD CRAFTS that can surely lead to having REAL POWER because such real knowledge of natural sciences IS REAL POWER. GET IT? I know most of you don't WANT to believe this and the neo-occult has just been around TOO LONG with all this TRASHING of our own REAL Hermetic knowledge. What do you THINK was sealed shut tight from public knowledge? REAL STUFF, not god bullshit! Same thing when old Masons known to have built bridges and doors with "unknown technology" (unknown to whom?) they'd say a DEMON told them. And FOOLS would go buy grimoires (making Masons richer selling them) and try to find out the BIG SECRETS. Fact is, the people themselves were able to THINK and DO. Anyway, some authors of fiction did tap into some of these mythemes. I told P. Smith that the so-called MYSTERIOUS word in "The Black Seal" by Machen, which Machen rendered as "IXAXAR" pronounced (as given by Machen) as Ishawshar or Ishachshar was a word I know of: ICHCHHA. The word is pre-Aryan Vedic (NAGA, i.e. Serpent) but might have also carried over into Sanskrit. That's I C H C H H A. It means WILL! That's all it means! But the so-called YOGA of this "Will" has to do with setting CERTAIN muscles in motion and paralyzing OTHER certain muscles. Machen must have known SOMETHING of this for in the tale "The Black Seal" a man finds a seal (like a stamp, not the animal) with these 60 letters engraved on it. He uses this to somehow transform himself in reverse evolution into a WORM! Now: first of all, anyone knowing scripts, hieroglyphs, pictograms and SYLLABLE based scripts would know that 60 is FAR TOO MUCH for an alphabet but FAR TOO LITTLE for hieroglyphs or pictograms. ONLY a syllabery would have something like 60 characters in it. Secondly, the word itself means Will and in the story a man uses his Will to de-evolve. Third, this Will-Power would be equated with what was called the WORM WITHIN, the OROBOROUS or what Machen and others of his time would have called a WORM but meant WYRM which means SERPENT in the lore of ancient British Island SERPENT people.
Also, during those days, there may have been a confusion on the part of common folk about worms and snakes (the literal animals) as they seem to look alike superficially. Bram Stoker made such a mistake in Lair of the White Worm. Nonetheless, the WORM Oroborous and the SERPENT that Eats Its Tale are the SAME EXACT THING. I also gave P.S. information about what MODERN BIOLOGISTS decided to call "The Worm Within" when they discovered something about literal worms and the human spinal column and GENETICS: something that CONFIRMED what we have always said about this! This kind of lore ties into this coded system and the actual Boiboloth script but NOT the 60 syllabery. It is quite alien to Western thinkers, NOT alien to Eastern peoples and WAS NOT alien to the ancient Hebrews (SOME of them: the Tanaim). The letters are on a circle divided by a pentacle (Pythagorean style: ONE POINT DOWN as rooted). There is the OLD order to the letters and the LATER order to them (like our letters of the ALPHA BETA would be a, b, c, d, e, etc. but the earlier Greek ones would be a, b, g, d, e, etc.). ALL the vowels would be shown on the BOTTOM POINT of the pentacle! The vowels were considered sacred and said as ONE SOUND even so they were shown as FIVE VOWELS, they were ONE SOUND. The ancient Hebrew Tanaim knew this and this can be GLIMPSED by the only vowel used in Hebrew: THE ALEPH. With marks on this Aleph you can GET the other sounds in pronounciation. The "yod" is not properly a vowel and has another esoteric meaning. Some of us innately tend to be born THINKING this way (just as language is PROVEN to be innate and even HOW CERTAIN PEOPLE SPEAK is now PROVEN to correlate with genetics: cf. Cavalli-Sforza and Greenberg, studies and any article by both or either of them: Cavalli Sforza is on the human genome project, Greenberg is the top linguist in the field). I have the diagram for the code of this with vowels in one spot, and explaining just WHAT this means is - well, like defining a chord's sound. Point is, you'd have to know this CODE to even BEGIN to do CROWLEY'S MESSAGE! Getting the vowels is hard. I personally DO NOT know how to do this decoding. In the 1990's I showed Phil what Solomon translated this as, and asked him if he saw ANYTHING he could decode to confirm this. Phil only saw Solomon's and had NO knowledge of what I had seen once before. Phil got the SAME two words: Social and Real and then dropped it as TOO time consuming and HARD. Either Solomon knew how to do it quickly or he was simply TOLD what it meant. Solomon saw something in HIS translation pointed to the Androgyne Man which HE used to mean a hermaphrodite (literally or metaphorical? Solomon never told ANYONE public just what it all meant and left it up to readers to figure it out). Point is here: The Worm Oroborous and the Serpent that Eats Its Tale have EVERYTHING TO DO with this Androgyne concept; so does yin/yang: and SO DOES THE SQUARE IN THE CIRCLE!! Crowley MENTIONED this importantly in his Book of Law. Exoterically it means the t-square and the compass and can even be seen on an ANCIENT stone rubbing from CHINA that I reproduced in the ROOTS ONE article. It does NOT mean a biological hermaphrotite at all: only a FOOL would think this. It means LIKE THE MENDES GOAT symbol. The GOAT FORCE, as YANG and the so-called Goddess force as Yin (in the West) with BOTH seen as "Dark" as Dark Goddess (such as Anna of the Nine Angles in Brit. Isles Serpent lore) and TANIST son (Actually FIVE Tanist sons akin to the FIVE Daimoni of the Pythagoreans and modern day E. Star) (NOT Son of the Light who is the TRADITIONAL THIEF of "words" but WITHOUT the "WISDOM TO KNOW MEANING.") The KUNDALINI, literally. It means something we FEEL, not just KNOW. We tend to THINK LIKE that: KNOW this, as if BORN knowing it like an animal, say a dog, would KNOW HOW to bark. BORN WITH this innately. LIKE LANGUAGE and how one speaks it is INNATE. ALL of this is tied strongly into the notion of consonants and vowels in the SPEAKING ABILITY of our species: FOR US! Consonants are OUTER, vowels are INNER. The Serpent and Oroborous BOTH not only represent the COSMOS's birth and end as ONE EVENT, but they represent this same process in us. That is what Crowley's BOOK OF LAW is ALL ABOUT! In short: you exist to LET IN the darkness (NUIT) which whoooshes thru you as LIGHT (HADIT) and which returns to the Bosom of Darkness (NUIT) and this is perpetual, like a perpetual thing (kundalini) always flowing thru you. That "WILL STOPPING WHEN YOU SAY WHY: you fall into BECAUSE": that's what all that's about! I.e., you STOP the FLOW (of entropy, dark force) when you question PURE WILL: you halt, brace, pause, FUCK UP as if to question LIFE and BEING ITSELF. It means NOTHING about having doubt about bullshit or questioning out of a HEART-FELT curiosity to KNOW. The people who lack this ORGANIC SELF will NOT, NOT, NOT understand this, and NEUROLOGY and ONLY NEUROLOGY explains WHY they CAN NOT understand this. Hence (As Crowley WRONGLY saw it): EVERYONE IS A STAR. Not a star as in stellar object. A STAR: PENTACLE. Pentacle is the Masonic and Pythagorean representation OF THIS FORCE IN LIVING BEINGS. I showed this in the DARK Kaballa article by drawing it and showing it with xeroxes from Isaac Myers book. I.e., you exist in order to RECEIVE the Darkness into you as it BECOMES LIGHT IN YOU (Vajre, Logos) and then RETURN IT BACK to Darkness! And you exist to DO nothing else. THAT is what Book of Law is SAYING: ON THE HIGHEST LEVEL, PERIOD. It couldn't be said MORE CLEARLY in that book and those who HAVE THIS immediately RECOGNIZED this. We know that some people DO NOT have this: we have names for them. Neurology has FINALLY defined it in a much more mundane and practical way. The way we knew of this was always a MYSTERY because we perceive people that lack this as DEAD, yet they are walking about quite alive! And we SEE THIS. So sure it would be a MYSTERY and we'd think up names for such people: Klippoth (empty shell!), Preta (hungering dead-alive, hungering for the LIGHT OF LIFE), and Thanatos, a word used which sums up their life-long BEHAVIOR. The so-called FIVE "RACES" of klippothic people "of strange flesh" as we called it, were people we could SEE were klippothic like this SOME of the time, but then remarkably ALIVE when doing certain things that they have a kind of brilliant clarity or KNOWLEDGE into and know RIGHT. Example (and she says it herself), Diane: feels WHOLE when doing her science thing or talking about it. Feels NUMB other times. Well, that's what she can FEEL. What one of us can HEAR and SEE is a whole other thing. We tend to see a person turn from being ALIVE FULLY to being a walking corpse: LITERALLY SEE this. It's in everything they do, how they look, move, express, etc.
It's as BLATANTLY CLEAR as if a musician hears a tone-deaf person singing WAY out of tune. Nothing to study or think about: the musician can HEAR IT IMMEDIATELY. Same but, can SEE it immediately, even often hear it in how they TALK. This was a MAJOR mystery until neurology cleared this up. What we are perceiving so clearly are BIO-ELECTRICAL states. What we are perceiving as klippothic, preta, etc are ANOSOGNOSIC or alexithymic states in a person. That we could SEE this is no big deal! It was just a MYSTERY until hard-science cleared it all up. LOTS OF PEOPLE DO see this, they don't quite know WHAT they are seeing either but many people I know have expressions for it in their OWN form of lingo-jargon.
The thing that Solomon translated (which I never confirmed) as "Second Coming" should not be seen as having to do with anything Xian, such as Jesus as a "first coming." NO. He is explaining a MUTATION in our species that produced what I wrote about in MALE DISEASE (INDEPENDENTLY WRITTEN long prior to ever HEARING of Solomon's ideas). There WAS a mutation that produced this alexithymia and anosognosia in man: when they began to SUBSIST PRIMARILY on cereals and, especially as children, lacked the fatty/carbohydrates gotten from MEAT which help AXONS (muscles, body nerves) to GROW. That alone would produce this numbing feeling and dualism, as if the HEAD (thinking organ) is severed from the body (neurology calling this the BODY MAP,and if that's not active, neurology proves there is NO LOGIC TO BE HAD!). That's it! Solomon called it the Necrophilic (Thanatos) Phallocratic (male/yang alone, no female/yin in the INNER SENSE) and Patriarchal process. YES: that IS when Patriarchies started: when agriculture started! Slowly, this MUTATION TOOK OVER. That's the FIRST COMING or what OUR tradition calls the KALI YUGA: an age of destructive behavior (destructive to all, not just each other) where the "anima" is seen as ENEMY and DEVOURING and where the male/yang or LIGHT tries to exist ALONE: the LIGHT ALONE, without the Dark. The MALE ALONE without the FEMALE. That is what this all MEANS. Crowley tuned into this when he said "ALL dualism is klippothic." He did not mean just a philosophy. He meant a STATE OF BEING. We are ALL saying the same things here, but neurology, a hard science, has FINALLY shed real light on this and empirically PROVED it and can TEST FOR it. This mutation was the FIRST COMING. And with this one could easily say that Social Realism in its BROADEST MEANING, was done away with. E.g. animals are ALL social realists or they PERISH. It does NOT mean humans in society interacting only with humans. It means humans IN society interacting with the WEB OF LIFE. The same is being said in the Adamic myth: Adamites were severed from the TREE OF LIFE! The Tree of Life is the same thing as the very real web of life, that interconnectedness of all things. Well, fact is, NO ONE is severed from it: they are in it alright, either as friends or dire enemies. These people FEEL detached from it: we noticed this and their behavior: we created our own words to DEFINE this. As sure as anaerobic bacteria lived by merging and BECOMING part of our mitochondria and acting with aerobic bacteria and as sure as these are PART OF what makes us human today: we are WOVEN INTO this web of life and there IS NO WAY out of it: not even death would get you out of it. Klippothic people DO NOT FEEL as if they are part of it: neurology explains WHY they feel this way. What WOULD we tend to think of people who reproduce at the rate of "e" and keep destroying arable land that depletes FASTER than they reproduce: when we know that the air, water, earth, etc. are FINITE and NOT getting bigger? We'd think these were CRAZY people with a destructive urge. We'd SEE them HATING nature and HEAR them making religion AGAINST nature and assume that they must be NOT OF nature. And we'd also SEE those trying to FIND nature as if they lost it! Nature is not "OUT THERE." It's RIGHT IN HERE! Touch yourself: THERE IS NATURE. Touch one hand to the other: THERE IS NATURE. To think otherwise is INSANITY of a strange kind gotten from NERVE damage as we saw it (chakra damage) but is real NEUROLOGICAL damage as now can be PROVEN, tested for! Such people can be SEEN not only striving to "find Nature" but to tend to create a FALSE SELF as if to compensate for the LACK of what neurology calls the "ORGANIC I" or real self, the ROOTED self we show with the 1 point down star: ROOTED. Far gone cases tend to create far out false selves! But what we SEE when confronted with such a person is THE PERSON, not some far out fake self! It's as clear as like the musician hearing a tone-deaf person wailing and imagining he is singing. We hear an OUT OF TUNE person and WISH he'd SHUT UP! It is as if the singing he does is a LIE! Same thing we SEE with a person who IS a fake-self. We SEE a walking talking LIE. It's VISIBLE. We weren't all that far wrong in seeing this as chakra damage because chakras have all to do with NERVES (axons) i.e., the BODY-MAP neurology is talking about now. By the way, alexithymic is a word NEUROLOGY created to define a SPLIT between thinking and feeling! Anosognosic is a word neurology created which means "Disease of Knowledge" where psychology (as Phil used it in Evolution post) called this a COGNITIVE disability. Disease is more a medical word. Neurologists are medical doctors choosing more medical words. We used "one of a kind" words to define these things. Disease, eg. could be of the throat or kidney. But no one is a throat klippoth. Yet I'd say the neurological word is much more specific and DEFINED than anything we magicians ever used to define it.
Solomon talked about a MUTATION, he spoke about something genetic and therefore, provable or disprobable. Cavalli-Sforza, one of the top people on the human genome project, wrote a very simplified version of his larger hard-science text. The simple version is called "HUMAN DIASPORA." On page 95-96 he explains in perhaps too simple terms: "In Europe the development of agriculture had lead to the spread of cereals as the PRIMARY FOODSTUFF over the last TEN THOUSAND YEARS. Unlike meat, particularly fish liver, cereals contain NO Vitamin D. They do, however contain a precursor that becomes Vitamin D IF exposed to the ultraviolet light from the sun's rays absorbed through the skin. Cereal eaters can produce enough Vitamin D to survive and grow normally IF THEY ARE FAIR-SKINNED. Therefore people can inhabit northerly regions where there is less sunlight and continue to eat cereal products because a fairer skin color has been SELECTED DURING EVOLUTION. In certain northerly regions, however, and even in the FAR NORTH, some peoples have always eaten enough Vitamin D from fish or meat to make fair skin UNNECESSARY. On the other hand, if skin is dark, the ultraviolet rays cannot get through (he means black, not just dark). Dark skin affords considerable protection against strong ultraviolet rays, which could otherwise be harmful, but it stops the transformation of PRECURSORS into Vitamin D. Where solar intensity is high, however, enough Vitamin D is still produced even if the skin is dark." This is HIGHLY simplified! The fact is, Carleton S. Coon, a forensic anthropologist (hard science) in Racial Adaptations (his last book) gives a much more technical explanation about this "color of skin" thing (and sure enough, ran into trouble doing it). Blacks, due to what Cavalli-Sforza describes here, get RICKETTS in climates such as Chicago in the USA. This can be fixed by ARTIFICIALLY adding Vitamin D to food which was done: it was added to milk. Whites, on the other hand, suffer a lot of damage in climates warm enough for palm trees to grow (like ancient Athens, Mesopotamian areas, etc) and ONE of these damaging things is what Coon called neurasthenia! NERVE damage he meant. He further details a MENTAL state they fall into which fits the description of neurology's alexithymia. (Which IS neurasthenia!) BOTH Coon and Sforza (in his large more technical genetics book) agree with what basically is told in oral history in a way. Oral history would have it that there were two TYPES of humans once: slant- eyed Naga of variable color that changed color easily, roamed from hot to cold places and adapted easily; and black-skinned round-eyed people which would now be BOTH the Dravidians and the Africans (used to be ONE PEOPLE) who inhabited the HOTTER and more coastal areas, Wallace Budge agrees, so does every single ANCIENT historian). Agricultural practices started around Jericho and then spread out from there. 10,000 years ago is the same time we say in doctrines that the Kali-Yuga began with "NEW PEOPLE" who were depigmented. I could never imagine how ectomorphic people (a heat adaption) could get depigmented (which would go AGAINST their own adaption). Now I know: diet. They GOT depigmented, the darker ones died off or left, they'd have had to select in favor of this depigmented type. Unlike the Naga who could get white like that with skin, the ectomorphic depigmented people got depigmented ALL OVER their bodies, hair and eyes too. The behavior of these new fair people would be EXACTLY as Coon defines and seen and noted by anyone else that saw them. We saw them as lacking the kundalini. That's alexithymia or neurasthenia. With Coon's data the ectomorphic blacks and these ectomorphic whites form ONE GROUP: one is a depigmented version of the other. The bones are the same (ectomorphic, long-headed, etc.) The other (Naga) group tend to use melanin as a SECONDARY pigmentation factor with a red and yellow pigmenting factor being foremost: they form another group most easily descried as the almond-eyed people that predominate in the world even today, from Mid-East in parts to all of Asia and throught both Americas (Amerinds). Sforza has the same data only he came to his conclusions using the human genome itself. Coon used forensic anthropology. We know what happened in the societies of the new fair people: patriarchy started and increased and TOOK OVER. Dualism was invented (due to how they FELT, they invented dualism; they felt adverse to nature, as if nature was something to ward off and fear or something to be placated as if an enemy). Nature was seen as "out there" and not felt as "in themselves." They invented religions that elevated themselves ABOVE nature and we know also they elevated themselves above other HUMANS who were in tune with nature. Many of them are NOT this way (or try not to be) today because they are modern people who "know better." Point is, they did these actions because they FELT certain things which neurology can TEST NOW. Neurology can't say where it started or if it's genetic or developmental brain-DAMAGE of some kind. If they combine their data, they'd see it is genetic and they'd know exactly where and when it started (as the doctrines know). We also know that this patriarchal way of life has pretty much taken over the planet and exists in OTHER PEOPLE. And we also know that earth's in trouble (BIG trouble). And also logic alone would allow any MORON to know that if you keep mistreating half of your own race (the female half) that something is going to eventually STOP WORKING. But for perhaps over 200 THOUSAND years Neandertal lived in peace, and pre-patriarchal humans (whose cultures were WIPED OUT, every trace of them, by patriarchies) were here: BOTH much much longer than a mere 10 thousand years. Everyone wants to say that nothing existed before the age of the written word. Rubbish. Tatars who shun the written word DOMINATE in Russian space sciences. What good is written word when the words are lies? What good is written word when people who know nothing can memorize words and PRETEND to know something? Euclid didn't have a written word: he was able to figure out things on his own. ONE example. Humans do not invent technology: VERY FEW HUMANS do it and it only took off in the West because the "Secret Guild traditions" were ended and the Open Seminiar traditions began wherein EVERYONE got their hands on this formerly SECRET MAGIC. Man has used this technology to live by artifice (compensate for no longer being able to do from WITHIN which would be a REAL CHANGE, a genetic one!) Example: some humans can inwardly adapt to hot OR cold climates and not suffer. Others have to cover themselves up to protect from cold AND from sun. Unlike animals that scavange things from other natural things (to build nests, spiders to make trap doors, etc.) humans have taken to using things that would destroy the green that gives them oxygen to breathe. That's not getting smarter. That's getting self destructively STUPIDER. That's proving that they are KLIPPOTHS or: anosognosics. SOME humans (very few) know quite a lot about BIO-technology eg, silk from spiders: better for writing on than ruining trees, strong as clothing instead of using agriculture and ruining arable land (which is practically gone now unless ALL rain forests get destroyed), and golden silk from one spider is as strong as bullet proof vest! Instead of asbestos and/or PETROLEUM products. NO hunter-gatherer or other nomadic/pastoral types of people EVER overpopulated. Yet the agricultural peoples tended to do this and yet the air, water and earth are NOT increasing: on the contrary! The earth is FINITE. But such BRAIN- -DAMAGED people imagine that a God on high just PUT the earth here to use like so much infinite air/water/earth and that they can just use the place as their dumping ground. Sure, this might last 10 thousand years. But how much LONGER than that CAN it last? Of course, their cherished WRITTEN WORD would bolster up this fantasy: their Holy Bible, the biggest pack of written and DANGEROUS lies on earth. One can't fault the Hebrews here (whose book the Christians DO NOT have) as they not only never were agricultural people but they FOUGHT WARS with them! HATED them! (So did we and we were FEARED by them who made us into their DEVIL image). Smithsonian of late (with more recent excavations) has come out and SAID THIS SAME KIND OF THING about the agricultural bee-hives and their destructive behavior versus the many other nomadic types they feared and who left hardly any records. Agricultural people were stagnant, unable to change. Whereas nomadics, DUE TO BEING nomads (and evolving IN that direction) were easily adaptable to many alternate ways of life and they BRED FOR such types. It is always the nomadic types that innately come up with the "dark doctrine" type thinking: INNATELY. Their feelings state that "man is just another animal intricately tied INTO the web of life and nature." Unlike the anosognosic (neurasthenic) others, these types KEENLY FEEL a force of nature, dark or hidden, FLOWING THRU them ALL THE TIME. It is THIS they have deified in some cultures! A force they can't see or hold onto that PERMEATES AND MOTIVATES all of nature (including themselves). That CAN be defined today: entropy or Second Law of Thermodynamics as known well in chemistry.
Path of LEAST resistance has always been the WAY of such people. But this is the OPPOSITE of what agriculturalists believed and practiced. They FOUGHT nature tooth and nail, tried to subdue it and DID subdue it for the MOMENT. At least, it "APPEARED" that way! We know that appearances are ILLUSIONS. When they no longer could subdue it and it SUBDUED THEM (starvation, famine, disease) they became bloody in war and WAGED wars of conquest on others. That is exactly what kept happening up until the time of colonial whites doing the SAME THINGS, upsetting every other culture they got in contact with and worst of all: those other cultures (formerly sparcely populated and in NICE AREAS to live) took to doing this SAME destructive agricultural land-wasting, overpopulating beyond limits and now nature is subdueing THEM and the whole planet is IN TROUBLE. I'm sure the klippoths will read this as if I have some "nature god" and wish this god to get revenge (on who, my own grandkids? DUH). Typical MORON. I have no gods. I AM nature and part of greater nature. There are no gods. We ARE in trouble. The whole eco-system is: FACT, neither pro nor con. Whites are not to blame: and they were BLACK before they depigmented, so will we blame blacks for becoming pale and neurasthenic? (The Black Muslims do: It all happened on the Isle of Patmos when the Mad Doctor Yakoob bred for depigmented people and made a race of blue-eyed devils, their definition of the word being identical to our word "preta.") I don't blame anyone. The WEATHER caused it to start. What is the TRUTH BEHIND this legend the Black Muslims have? Cavalli-Sforza defined it quite well!
Extreme climates do NOT encourage one to try to create a civilization - and chances are if you tried to build anything there using the usual artifice it wouldn't last. To the Naturalist, the culture/people who THEMSELVES adapt physically and in harmony with the environment, become part of it, and let IT mold THEM, are people who have learned the WISDOM of the Ages. The fact is, we aren't chimps because our ancesters DID JUST THAT! They INWARDLY CHANGED and along that way they got some peculiar Aquatic adaptions that we STILL HAVE to this day. But what humans started (and can't seem to stop) 10 thousand years ago caused disaster not only in nature but in their OWN DEVELOPMENT. Agriculture works SOMETIMES if you don't mutate the plants and wreck the land doing it and don't wreck your own nervous system with it. The nomad way has to be adopted in most other places. It is a fact that when you "conquer the land," in time the land conquers your descendents! Then there is no more land and no more people on the land. Interfere NOT with Nature! This is a concept that ALL non-white peoples used to have and still have in some few places. (Do not burn down the "jungle," it's a rain-forest, you idiot!) These people felt themselves to be PART of that Greater Nature.Their own deities show that they had these ideas; the way they lived shows they KNEW this. For some reason, some humans are so resistant to change that they try, in vain, to battle it! Yet they are NOT the ones who create technology: FAR FROM IT! It is ALWAYS people who FEEL IT FIRST (like Einstein) who then (if they are smart enough) prove what they know thru what they FELT with their bodies (neurology calls this bodymap) and they are ALWAYS humbled by the Greater Nature around them which they FEEL PART OF. But these out of synch types are ALWAYS the one to praise human achievement and yet they can't even UNDERSTAND these things when they are taught (by that also overly praised written word bullshit). Written words, indeed, enable STUPID PEOPLE to pass as "knowers" but KNOWERS can never be fooled by this! As for the Web of Life?
Once upon a time, there was a worm. It had no eyes, but only spots that were photo- sensitive and contained various shades of pigment. The fact is, this worm evolved into a fish-like thing and that evolved into humans. There has been a kind of "Holy Grail" in biochemistry and neurology: "what guides the growth of growing AXONS." Axons are long nerves that hook up to the NEURONS to ALLOW THE BRAIN to act as a register or "PERCEIVER" of the WORLD AROUND IT! (Tantriks have known this axonic influence that goes up the spinal column, into the brain stem and then into the brain, as "Kundalini." They knew this by FEELING THIS IN THEMSELVES.) Some scientists, as shown on a Discovery Channel special on the brain, call this force "WILL." It is not "thinking," nor is it neurons. Two chemical factors have been discovered after a hundred-year search: enzymatic proteins in a month old human foetus. They have been called netrin-1 and netrin-2. Netrin is Sanskrit for "One Who Guides." The netrins are closely related to growth factors found in nematodes (roundworms), which likewise influence and guide growth and migration of the worm's sensory axons. After 600,000,000 years of evolution between man and worm, the genetic code for worm and human guidance enzymes is STILL over 50% IDENTICAL: a startling and remarkable similarity in biology. If anything is supposed to distinguish humans from worms, it is supposed to be the nervous system! This similarity has caused several biologists to start calling the human spinal cord "The Worm Within Us." (Tantriks and others of the Dark Tradition also called it this Ouroboros Worm and only later came to change the name to the Serpent Within.) The migration of nerve axons in the human foetus's spinal cord is IDENTICAL to the migration of sensory apparatus in the worm's. Worms have long been the primary subject of study to evolutionary biologists because worms have consistently proven to be a LINK between primeval single-cell organisms and multicellular ones such as fish and people. But that the FORMATION OF the human spinal cord in the human foetus REMAINS IDENTICAL to the worm's came as a surprise to many researchers who projected or IMAGINED some sort of great biological gulf between the 3 pound (1.36 kilogram) human brain and the pencil-eraser-size worm central nervous system. With this alone, you can see how there still exists a LINK to trace back where we came from: hundreds of millions of years ago! This shows the INTERWOVEN Web of Life. Environmentalists tend to see this clearly when they look at the food chain: but that's cerebrally seeing it (not carnally feeling it) OUTSIDE of themselves. We feel it WITHIN: that's why we KNOW it and come up with the SAME ideas and say the SAME THINGS thruout time no matter where we are. Anosognosia is the LACK OF this "body-map." Defines klippoths, our word.
Fact is: as I said, we have been forced to live by pure artifice, even
"adopting" clothing to keep warm (NOT an adaption, but an adOption) that
has nothing to do with REAL evolution (that is, evolution from WITHIN).
Evolutionary "progress" involves LOSS of enzymes, rather than gain in them.
Humans in particular are enzyme INDIGENTS. So we HAVE to go to lower life
forms to get these thru food. These "lower life forms" are biochemically
richer. And what happens when, by insane agricultural practices FORCED
on some humans by a WEATHER CHANGE, behaviors threaten to wipe out MANY
OF these lower life forms and wipe thousands of them out every day? Humans
already LOST the estrus and this is NO small matter: it's a MIND BOGGLER
if you are ABLE to REALLY THINK about it. We are very like dinosaurs in
that we are BULLYING other life forms, holding them back, much as dinosaurs
HELD BACK and "bullied" mammals. ONLY with dinosaurs gone did mammals get
THE CHANCE. We are not chimps in trees because we INWARDLY evolved, we
CHANGED PHYSICALLY, GENETICALLY: only ONE PERCENT difference between a
human and a chimp! ONE PERCENT. How long did it take for humans to OBTAIN
(and STILL retain) these aquatic adaptions we HAVE NOW? Just based on these
adaptions alone, I think there is something WAY OFF BASE about evolution
of man and the pieces of fossils we manage to find where we GO LOOKING
for them: in Africa. Did australopithicenes have estrus? No way to tell!
I can tell you, absolutely, that if female dogs lost the estrus, dogs would
SOON go extinct unless they somehow changed their social organization in
some way. Some BIG missing chunk of data is here, SOME STORY of what happened
to our ancestors. "The Aquatic Ape" definitively explains SOME of it, or
at least ALL the aquatic adaptions. But NOTHING explains the loss of estrus.
The behavior of females, AS SOON AS THEY HAVE THE RIGHTS TO DO THESE BEHAVIORS
WITHOUT FEAR...definitely would be PREDICTABLE in lieu of this estrus loss.
Over 50% of marriages FAIL after 4 years (studies show, what about after
10 years?). If 50% of tonsillectomies failed in 4 years the operation would
be halted as an unfeasible waste of time. So why is ANYONE trying to hold
up the CORPSE called "the family, monogamy, marriage?" Well, WHO is doing
this? Not us! WE never had monogamy anyway and the family was loosely defined
as whatever happened to be kin and close by. I notice it's always WOMEN
pointing out these statistics and mostly MEN who balk. Balk they will:
they can go fuck THEMSELVES. Women are changing, that's for sure. Men?
Federally funded genetics program unearthed a SET OF GENES for violence
in such men. Patriarchal societies always produced VIOLENT men: agricultural
men. NOT SO the other societies. You can't just enslave women and expect
things to WORK in the long run. Just the stress, total HATE felt, and all
that in the women AS SHE IS PREGNANT effects the child in her womb. You
don't have to think magically on this: think in terms of BIOCHEMISTRY.
Unhappy miserable women are biochemically DIFFERENT than joyful happy ones.
Hearing some of these feminists talk about "parasites in their bodies"
when referring to foetuses is a mind-blower. But that's evidently how THEY
FEEL about it! WOW! That they CAN just abort their unborn babies is WOW!
These things are ALL evidence of change of an INNER KIND, a REAL change.
It's ONLY xtoid types that fear change. Not us. We go with the flow. Magically
speaking the EVES, given the chance, become LILITHS! The ADAMS balk and
complain and try to set THEIR HOUSE in order. We Serpents are NOT OF their
house: our women are NEITHER Eves NOR Liliths and our men are not Adams.
Their own literature reflects this (yet NOTHING of ours does!) The woman,
according to ubiquitous Western literature and not JUST xian scholarship,
is either the shrew who won't put up with being bossed or she is the docile
help-mate underneath her husband. She is either the whore and temptress,
or she is the virgin and wife. THERE IT IS: she is either Lilith or Eve!
Our literature and the WAY WE THINK/FEEL doesn't have any kind of this
dualism or any kind of notion of EITHER variant of women. NOT AT ALL! As
such, most of our women can't relate to feminism or don't care about it.
BUT OUR MEN CAN relate to it! Sure: they'd be the SERPENTS tempting the
other population's EVES! Our women tend to see their women as nothings.
But we instead see their MEN as BHUTAS: things to be ERADICATED from the
planet. Wiped off. We see them as utterly useless shit but dangerously
obstructive and crazy violent. But our MEN do not see this quite: they
see their men as nothings.