|
|
According to latest genetic data: Chimps and Bonobo are (were?) classed as different species; Chimp was Pan-Satyrus and Bonobo was Pan-Pygmeus. Now it is discovered that the Bonobo has MORE GENES in common with man than does the chimp and also that chimp and bonobo are CROSS-FERTILE with each other. They were often mistaken for each other too. They live in different habitats and don't really hang-out with each other, but they ARE cross-fertile. It is known that the Chimp line that split with humans, split into TWO lines - chimp and bonobo. OUT doctrines state that human lines are also NOT JUST ONE line, yet the doctrines do NOT judge these lines of man in terms of "race" as is commonly thought of today (white, black, yellow).
What is noticed at first is the similar appearance of chimp and bonobo with slight differences. Bonobo are WAY smarter and MUCH DIFFERENT in overall behavior than are chimps.
The humans we always call xtoid, herd, non-satanic types are VERY CHIMP like in ALL WAYS - all of their hateful behaviors (hateful to us) are PURE CHIMP. Whereas the bonobo are MOST LIKE (not exactly like) us Satanists! What is also odd is that orangutans that branced off even further back than did the gorilla from humans, are STILL very much like most herdish humans even so they live in a very different habitat. The bonobo is now considered very much like the australopithecines who were OUR OWN ancestors, or so they still think (virology data would tend to refute that - and that's microbiology hard data shown with genes: has to do with endogenous C retrovirus marker).
We have ALWAYS contended that Serpents are NOT THE SAME KIND as Adamites. What would happen if the world were inhabited by mostly chimps and everyone thought they were ""ALL chimps" but then people noticed that "some chimps" are VERY DIFFERENT in behavior and intelligence than other chimps? They'd not think to class them as a separate type or species, especially IF they were CROSS FERTILE and also mixed into the rest of the population. What KIND of ape results when a chimp crosses with a bonobo?? Something more like the chimp or more like the bonobo?
The fact is, pure blacks in their native habitats were and are VERY different and they are not alike themselves either frmo tribe to tribe or group to group, nor do they LOOK alike. Some even seem to have emotions that other humans do not have and they have other physical things NO ONE ELSE has too, not all of them, but from group to group. But the same thing goes for what Coon called the Paleoarctic race - i.e., US. The rest of the temperate zoners, whether Aryans or Semites are they are known, are PURE CHIMP-like humans. Everything they DO is chimp-like and when they are shown another way, a way giving them more freedom, they just revert back to their hateful slaveish chimp behaviors. No no dares to say this about humans anymore, but the neurological data would show it well enough. Behavior differently would imply THINKING differently which means BRAIN IS DIFFERENT - is wired up differently. This is PROVEN by Damasio and others now. Note: by hateful I mean hateful to Satanists; by Semites I mean ALL Semites, predominantly the Egyptians of old in part and the Islamic peoples today.
Also, in Male Disease (see on website) article and other articles is shown the FACT: it has been the non-chimp-like humans that have always HAD, always THOUGHT UP, the recognizable Dark Doctrines as opposed to the Male Solar Phallic Cult or Dualisms of the chimp-like-humans. ALWAYS. Even the "other side" notices this! But we Satanists are no longer the only ones saying this! As I "predicted" in 1990 to Peter: things will COME TOGETHER, data will come out, and this data will show a definite picture. Antonio Damasio's data, his laboratory PROOF is, so far, the BIGGEST PORTION of this picture. "Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence" by R. Wrangham and D. Peterson (scientists) - they are using the word "demonic" in a NON-Satanic manner the way Xians would use it (odd, since the Xians and Moslems and other types like that are more like what fits into their own definition of "demonic," and as the neurological data would predict: they always disagree with themselves). They show (in "Demonic Males") that violence such as rape, border raids, etc. is inherent in human MALES. After studying a variety of apes and chimps for more than 20 years, the authors tend to think this is the case (it is obvious to us that it IS the case and not just as this pertains to violence but to IN-GENERAL behavior!). They feel that civilization and larger brains neutralize male violence to some extent and so do women. (I'd contend this: so-called civilization is where man BEGAN to to murder man; not before that! The more civilization rose the more violent man dot until this NUCLEAR age!). They also then show the harmonious society of the bonobo chimp of Zaire in which equality of the sexes has contributed to a peaceful environment. Their book is heavily referenced. Also, backing up this data and out Male Disease article and Phil's article on Matriarchy (this should be retitled Matriliny because such societies do not have "-archies" of any sort: modern word for -archies would be CLASSES), is the excellent article in Apocalapse Culture: "Agriculture, Demon Engine of Civilization," by John Zerzan. He doesn't say so, but he is using a lot of hard-sci sources and Smithsonian Institute recently came to a similar conclusion.
Classism can be seen in all the xtoid or religionist preta-locas (spheres where pretas exist). The book by Marilyn French, "War Against Women," best illustrates the ATROCIOUS (crime against humanity) behavior of males in such societies thoward their OWN WOMEN (their OWN POSTERITY!) (Gee, and Satanists thought Xianity was bad? HA!) Here you have the male class versus female class - a "caste" is adjudged by what you have between your legs. Another NON-ANCIENT but PURELY MODERN sustem of classism is the insane adjudgement of "what you are" based on the color os your hair and eyes (anglos versus Mediteranneans). Next the shape of the features (Anglos co-opt the mediterraneans, including Celts, into their group because they INVENT all the goodies and are smarter but Anglos really do not feel kinship with these people as we ALL KNOW SO WELL...), where no its the round-eyed West versus the almond eyed East; even so a lot of the "West" is ALSO almond-eyed and the Anglos SURELY notice this but give lip-service to their "honorary subjects." Next comes the blacks, a rather recent addition to the classist system, since the advent of slavery. Then the next stage came with Civil Rights and laws banning discrimination against people based on gender or race and this all won by BATTLING of course. But the xtoids HAVE to have something to pick on so they chose gays. But gays are not as sissy as one might think and they FIGHT BACK. And so now, one can see these same loathsome, dispicable bhutas picking on the only "difference" left for them to NOTICE (as if they HAVE to notice implying they HAVE to compare themselves in order TO notice). They pick on FAT PEOPLE. Now, of all the --- what? how? why? ---things. Yet this makes no more sense than the rest of their INSANITY.
Thus far, FIVE GENES have been located and are known to be genes FOR obesity; not chubbiness, but outright obesity. They are NOT anti-survival at all. The fact that these genes exist and animals that have them not only survived and are healthy but form a "type" of their own is proof of this. But the xtoid and/or NAZI tendency to think they do "eugenics" when they in fact to DYSGENICS is typical: these Adamites ALWAYS fuck themselves up. They'd want to breed fat folks out of the population? They do this by making them into pariahs, making it "peer group shit" anathema to date a fat person. Peer group crap only worts on ABJECT HERD SCUM. They LOVE homozygosity and yet, this is DYSGENIC as it turns out. HETROZYGOSITY is preferred - that is, where you have genes from only one parent for obesity so that the trait CAN show up if it has to. This is all SO see thru. None of these losers are interested in the genetic facts or evolutionary end of this or even in health. Most of the geeks are into gegetarianism which is what no carnal human would ever get into. What these GEEKS waht to do is pick on non-geeks. Let us look at the skinny bones: HOW JESUS-like they are, they look like concentration camp survivors even when they are NOT anorexic or bulemic. They are like skeletons with flesh stretched on them: they are women that look like BOYS. They dress up their prelude to PICKING ON another person (like the fucking bullies they are) by mouthing off smart-sounding vomit about "health" as if they know a thing about health. If they were Healthy, in the Satanic sense, they'd not be NOTICING who is fat or not, OR CARING. That they really are doing is FINDING a victim, FINDING something to BITCH at, to pick on, because that is the ONLY THING that makes these pathetic bhutas feel "powerful." The obesity gene, when it is expressed (phenotype), would enable fat people to survive in times of famine. That's obvious. [note by re-typist: Not to mention the GREAT likelihood of famines in the near future to to overpopulation and environmental destruction (no suitable land for growing equals NO CROPS)... HA HA HA HA HA HA.]
The metabolism of chubby or FAT people differs: it's slower. Most fat people DO NOT overeat, many of them eat less than skinny people: this usually can be seen by the WAY a person is fat. Do they have fatness in one area like a beer gut? Or are they fat ALL OVER in proportion? People who are chubby all over in proportion usually also have LARGE BONES, endomorphic.
We noticed, through the ages of observing xtoid dualists, that ECTOMORPHS are the freaks: they THINK stupid and are not fit for either very cold OR very hot environments. They tend to be overly chimp-like (they'd scream and imagine they saw a "monster" if a man shows up with a face burned by fire) in their fear and in their violence. They are like crazy apes. The large plodding and peaceful endomorphs are nothing like this. And not only that, it is never chubby or big-boned people that ever THINK TO make fun of the skinny folks! NOTICE! All of these xtoid and stupid behaviors are done by a small portion of monolithic tending lunatics who do it due to FEAT and nothing but FEAR: fear of what is different. And they'd wannabe Satanists?
Even in what they like to read, the so-called "heroic" shit all romantic pipe-dream crap, you can see the inherent Jesus (or Sosiosh, the Aryan Persian ORIGINAL). Superman: ordinary bloke is REALLY super-person and what would Metropolis and poor man DO without Superman, note his real name: Clark Kent! Or Spiderman - another bloke with SUPER-natural powers like Jesus in a spider suit. Same shit. Even Vampirella (Roger Corman's no-tits, no-ass version recently) escape from reality tripe. Same theme, always the same theme. Always some SUPER-natural man out there to SAVE humanity from itself - pathetic Jesus substitutes. Compare this to the Satanic review Nemo gave to Star Gate where the ORDINARY PEOPLE use the "supernatural" technology of the asshole Ra to kick Ra's ass; or to the Green Dragon Inn revolt (American Revolution) where no one knows excactly WHO "lead" the group and no one cares. Compare this to Lenin's wactions where he turned the workers, fighting a war FOR the Ra-Czar, against the Czar. Not long afterward, the same TYPES of people there turned Lenin into a god! That surely was NOT Lenin's intent, nor was it George Washington's intent and he said so. THE PEOPLE (the proletariat!) should be armed in order so they can overthrow another group of people that set themselves up to be "overlords" (government). That's SATANIC. But the xtoids, the geeks, tend to PUT the overlords in their lordly position and don't even RECOGNIZE IT when they make themselves into slaves: PURE xtoid shit. And it's also pure CHIMP SHIT, ape behavior, orangutan behavior - NO different. It is notable here to point out that chimps have no lips, chimps have no body-fat on them, chimps are hairy. You know, it owuld be ONE THING if "skinny" was the current style, like mini skirts of maxi skirts - a style and nothing more. Like braids in hair, or curley hair, or straight hair or various colors of hair, or make-up. Then people liking the style of skinny would simply go for it. But this is DEFINIITELY NOT what we are seeing here. They ARE NOT happy about being skinny at all. Proof? They HAVE to go out of their way to BE BASTARDS to anyone who is NOT skinny. This is fine for Xians foing this tho it would be against Jesus's teachings to do such awful things to other people. We know NO xians follow these teachings, and that they even NEEDED TO BE TAUGHT such things proves something about the KIND of people Jesus must have been trying to teach: HUMAN SCUM. But Satanists? Satanists relish individualism and difference. The classic image of Satan, as I pointed out this obvious thing, is OUR OWN IMAGE. Almond eyes, cheekbones, pouted mouth, scant facial hair: TATAR face or Turanian looking. He is a musician and a fantastic dancer in the ballroom, or folk-dancing style. Satan doesn't do ballet! But Satan DOES do a feisty walse (the oberik), the polka, the jig, the lambada, the tango for sure! and other such folk dances that DID NOT EXIST in the purely Aryan groups like in England. But let us look at the images of the Demons who, in the muth Satanists are SUPPOSED TO KNOW ABOUT, are with Satan. MANY of them are chubby, MANY of them are short, too, some squat, etc. Many have BIG noses and BIG lips and so forth. (They ALL have HUGE COCKS....) HA HA HA.
Another thing the PURITAN XIANS seem to forget about the MYTHOLOGY of Satan: two of the so-called deadly sins ascribed to them by xtoids which, for us, would simply be INDULGING IN JOY (not "over-indulging" because, as we have already spelled out to death, that's NOT enjoying anything, and we notice WHO we had to spell that out to: the fucking xtoids). Gluttony? Lust? MANGIA! AMORE! Both Latino words, we notice.
What about Greed? Not for ostentatious purposes which are not SELF-ish at all but more at that chimp-classist nothingness that is NO plus to human survival anymore: such ostentation is never done WITHOUT OTHERS AROUND (the herd) to GAWK at the show-off. Such people do this in an attempt to lord it over the gawkers but they never imagine someone might bash them on the head and TAKE their belongings frmo them. This ostentatious behavior has NOTHING TO DO with individuality - it's all to SHOW THE HERD implying you NEED THE HERD around to NOTICE you. So if you have on "This Brand" of leather jacket now you can FIT INTO the group (herd shit) and it means you are the Big Honcho Man now (chimp bullshit) which we Satanists call CONSUMER SUCKERISM. So, are the skinny addicts "being skinny" because they really WANT TO BE skinny? That they HAVE TO pick on non-skinny people proves this to be false. Most skinny people are also NERVOUS people, pent-up and borderline hysterics. Proof?: bulemia and anorexia is RAMPANT in THEIR group - not in any other group. Skinny people seem to want to eliminate all that nice subcutaneous body fat (tho they hardly have any to start with, like CHIMPS) and in this sense they are like ascetic xians: ANTI-FLESH. These people are akathartic, hence their bullying behavior is "the ophionic" taking over: they only feel "better" when they can NYAAAH against someone different with no other criteria except "they look different." They have the definite desire to WIPE THE SMILE off someone's face, to DESTROY THE JOY in another person's heart. That is what they are REALLY DOING. If they can get the fat person (or any other target they aim at) to feel bad about himself, then they IMAGINE they feel happy about this: wrong. Their fleeting happiness is fast gone and their EMPTINESS returns. If they manage to get the poor victim to kill himself (as has happened with chubby KIDS being the victims) oh, then they can have a GUILT FEST and WALLOW in their fucking guilt which is better than the gnawing emptiness they have. All their Mia Cupla at this point is only MORE VANITY on their part. How EASY it is for these klippoths to ho out of their way to make another person unhappy and HOW HARD it is for them to go out and ENJOY THEMSELVES as if Fate, Fortuna (Satana) DENIES them this simple pleasure. From my perspective, I think they do these things because they WANT chubby people to turn around and EXTERMINATE them in a paroxism of vengeance: after all, that's exactly what pretas DID with non-whites which resulted in their being MASSACRED!
That's that sadomasichistic quality to their race with their various Armegeddon or Ragnarock fantasies being enacted over and over, like in Rhodesia or Congo in the past. They provoke others to GIVE THEM their Armegeddon over and over. They LOVE to be massacred: that's what Thanatos IS, by the way.
NORMAL people tend to look AT what they are attracted TO. They often don't tend to even NOTICE what doesn't attract them. A person turned on by the Elvis Presley type, would tend to NOTICE people who looked like that and get close to them. They WOULD NOT tend to notice people who looked like Mick Jagger and mock them out for "NOT looking like Elvis!" A person attracted to the Elvis type would have a "radar" that perked up whenever the TYPE was around and the radar would tend to screen over the non-Elvis type: hence comes the well-known notion that a guy or girl might say, "I like that person SO much, but he'she doesn't seem to know I even exist." YES! Exactly: that's NORMAL. But to go out of your way to pick on a guy for having huge lips like Mick Jagger is ABNORMAL. Is this person BOTHERING anyone? Keep picking on him and he might get it into his head to START bothering you - to KICK YOUR BUTT! The same kind of SHIT was seen in the music trends of the 1970's. Happy, dancing people in their DISCO clubs doing their OWN THING and minding their OWN BUSINESS not noticing what "others" are donig OR CARING. Meanwhile, the hard-rock people (MOSTLY pent-up white/xians) had to put forth a literal campaign to put down disco. They'd go out of their way to say, and to write, "Disco Sucks." (Wrong: their pathetic doormat girlfriends SUCKED their PINKY DICKS is more like it.) The Disco crowd were dancing people - mostly guys wou could FUCK, too. Another thing the xtoids like to do is put down, or use as abusive, a term they LOVE TO DO themselves. Well, now the rest of us mock them out for DOING it: BOO HOO, we can hear them squirming and whining about it. (Hey, someone calls you fat? Call her FLAT-CHESTED. OUCH!)
What this shows is NOT that the hard-rockers LIKE their music: most of them are tone-deaf. It doesn't show that they don't like dancing either. It proves they CAN NOT dance but probably would like to be ABLE to - and this is not a matter of learning, but of letting the cthonic music GET INTO the body and moving you. They CAN NOT do this: they are TOO up tight. But they are JUST LIKE the homophobes that go out of thier own way to find gays and pick on them. Recent scientific studies showed that homophobic straight males responded in terms of measurable arousal MORE THAN GAY MEN did to watching two men making love. It also showed that non-homophobic but totally straight males did not respond sexually at all, they may have been watching wind blowing around the branches of a tree for all it mattered to them. It doesn't surprise me to find that most homophobic men are into the "toothed orifice" instead of a cunt. HA HA HA.
One sure way for the latest dumping ground (fat folks) to silence the BHUTAS butting into their rolley polley lives, is to SIT ON THEM - push them down and SQUASH them. I.e., KICK THEIR BUTTS! Believe me: terror works great. Don't let ANYONE make you feel bad about yourself. Understand that anyone who goes out of his/her way to try to do this ALREADY feels horrible about HIMSELF/HERSELF - that's WHY he is a bully. He feels like SHIT about himself and he hates to see ANYONE happy.
What do I do to people I see picking on friends of mine for such things? OH, you don't wat to know eh eh eh. They can't pick on me and they hardly ever try to based on appearance. For starters, you can encourage a normal woman who IMAGINES she is fat and who irritates you, to go on a DIE-IT (smile). You can suggest for her lots of BEANS for starters. Then introduce her to minerals (more like plant food or bird food). You can show her how to make herself PUKE and suggest that this is harmless. In other words, you can be Satan and give the Eve bitch LOTS OF APPLES. If you are able to PERSUADE (I am VERY good at this...), you can talk her into getting liposuctions or something VERY EXPENSIVE like that. I once knew a wmoan who, knowing I worked in a medical school, asked me about getting implants. I told her what I know: costs a fortune, they turn rock hard, they look like shit. But she already knew this so why did she ask? OH: wanted to know if there is a cancer risk. Well, NO! So she got them. A few months later she is bemoaning the appearance and hardness (ROCK hard, felt like knees on her chest). I explained what I knew about what causes this: scar tissue from healing inside. She wanted to know how to stop this from happening. Stop healing? Well, I told her, taking CRACK is one sure way to stop yourself from HEALING. That was my advice to her: TAKE CRACK. Of course, this was not a woman I LIKED, need anyone wonder about that? Did she take my advice? Well, I never found out because, as the grapevine said, she dropped out of circulation and had "gone to the pits." Of course, the Satanic Question is this: WHY THE FUCK did the bitch ask me about this when I'm not a doctor and not a plastic surgeon? Because she, xtoid like, regarded me as "The Head" that can think FOR her. Here: HAVE an apple, bitch. Did I have reason to HARM this person in this passive way? Yes: once in the past she bad-mouthed me saying a FALSE THING. That was ENOUGH. I take the dictim of responsibility to the self and for what YOU DO very seriously. It's self-destructive to ask a person advice after you have BAD MOUTHED them with falsehoods and you KNOW it might have gotten back to the person. But we know how THEY are. Example: if Mrs. Gidney (recently flamed by a friend of mine...) ever got back in the COS's good graces she'd probably try to "make nice" with Karl. I recently sent a friend of Bolton's a list of original Nazi music (collector's stuff) since he seemed to want it. Sure, Bolton can ask me (and I will generously give this to him) for any copy of any song he wants: anything to FURTHER destroy the relations he has with his son (which he himself already is wrecking) I'll gladly CONTRIBUTE TO. Imagine playing that shit with a non-white and partly Jewish son around? HA HA HA. I take myself very seriously: DESTROY XTOIDS. Every chance I get, I do, especially when it's no big deal to do it, it's SO EASY.
Ridero Ergo Sum. From Smiley.