|
|
There is a remarkable analogy well worth pursuing between Klippothic versus natural, instinctive, organic humans as compared to black holes versus stars. In this analogy, it will be seen that Klippoths are like black holes, while human animals are like stars, and that the relationship between Klippoths and non-Klippoths is like the relationship between black holes and stars. The analogy is itself very natural and unstrained, since black holes result from the death of stars, just as Klippoths result from the death of the beast or organic self in a human. It is difficult to explain what a Klippoth is to someone who is not a Klippoth, and even harder to explain it to someone who IS a Klippoth save for those with insight into themselves. These admit they can not fathom what an animal (of any species) is tho they know they are NO LONGER as they should be, animals. This is because to understand what a Klippoth is, one has to have an idea of what an organically whole, instinctive human animal is - as a basis of comparison. Likewise, astrophysicists arrived at an understanding of what black holes are by studying stars, and if you study black holes in modern physics, teachers will invariably present them to you by explaining or reviewing what a star is.
Intelligent laypersons believe that stars are very large bodies of very hot gases and plasma that are powered and heated up by thermonuclear reactions. This is not correct! (Hold on there before you say "WHAT?!?") Thermonuclear reactions on a star actually cool the star off. They do this by explosively ballooning the star outward against the very powerful GRAVITATIONAL compacting and collapsing that the star undergoes. If it were not for the thermonuclear reactions, which result FROM gravity crunching and fusing atoms together in the star, gravity would cause the star to collapse even further, making it even hotter, so hot that if this happened on the sun, the Earth's water would burn off in minutes. It is gravity that really powers and heats up a star! A long-lived star, like the sun, has a nice BALANCE between the gravitational tendency to collapse and get overly hot, and the thermonuclear tendency to swell up and radiate the heat off. If this balance was upset, the star would collapse and, if big enough, a black hole would result. Likewise, Klippoths are people who have completely lost a balance in their lives, an organic fine-tunement that the Pythagoreans use to symbolize by a PENTACLE and study in the laws of string vibration and musical harmony. When a star undergoes gravitational collapse, it dies and a black hole remains, just as a Klippoth remains when the human animal dies - nothing really just disappears!
When a black hole forms, the star has become so overwhelmed by gravity that nothing can escape it. That is why black holes emit no light, unlike stars, which emit vast amounts of light, heat, and other radiation. All light is dragged back into the black hole. If an intrepid astronaut approached a black hole too closely, it would also be dragged into it, never to escape. Again, there is an important and PROFOUND comparison with Klippoths versus organic humans here. A bold astronaut would be dragged into a star if he got too close to it also, and likewise destroyed. His matter would be torn apart too, atom by atom, as he entered the star's swirling incandescent gases. However, his matter would be recycled by being reradiated or discharged later, even if eons from now. All of the heavier elements in your body were manufactured in the cores of stars, iron from the oldest stars, e.g. If it were not for stars, almost all of the universe would be just hydrogen and helium, the two lightest elements. There would be no calcium for your bones or iron for your blood - not anywhere in the universe! There would have been no catalytic metals on Earth: the first large, organic RNA molecules that preceded life as we know it on the Earth could not have formed. The iron in your blood was not produced in the sun - the sun is not old enough to have made any yet. This iron was produced in some older star that has long since died of which part or all of the sun itself may be composed. Thus stars recycle matter they gravitationally devour and burn up, and they create the wonderful, colorful panoply of elements known to us, from the pinks of manganese and the rich yellow of sulfur, to the shiny silver white of magnesium.
But unlike stars, black holes do not recycle matter. They drag everything back that they devour and hold it within themselves. The matter and light from the star that suffered gravitational collapse to form the black hole are never released. This may be compared to a Klippoth, who cannot seem to fully release his kundalini, and who is devouring and barren.
Black holes have a kind of membrane which separate them from the rest of the universe, unlike stars, which possess atmospheres in which viscous gases thin and attenuate as distance from a star's core increases. A star does not have a well-marked line of demarcation between "I and Thou." A black hole's demarcating membrane, on the other hand, is called the hole's event horizon; compare this to the klippothic "clique." Anything inside the event horizon is forever gravitationally captured by the black hole, and cannot leave it; compare this to leaving a clique presided over by a klippoth. Light at the event horizon does a weird dance, hovering forever there, like at the edge of a shadow. It cannot escape the black hole's gravity either. All the light and matter that the black hole devours is simply added to the hole's mass. The hole CREATES NOTHING, GIVES UP NOTHING, RECYCLES NOTHING. Unlike stars, whose light can be examined by a an instrument known as a spectroscope to see the stars' constituents, a black hole is invisible, its presence being known only by its looming gravity. Unlike stars, which come in all colors have all sorts of distinguishing characteristics, all black holes are featureless and virtually alike. Physicists have a joke about this: they say, "Black holes have no hair." Black holes cannot and do not even pulsate, as many stars do. There is only one thing they are known to do: they CAN rotate, around and around, forever, and the only other way to distinguish one black hole from another (aside from its location in space and time) is its mass: some are bigger than others, having formed from bigger stars, or having devoured more neighboring matter, which is added to its total mass. Whatever a black hole devours leaves no trace, so blackholes are the greatest DESTROYERS OF INFORMATION in the cosmos. When a star swallows up a disoriented astronaut, his matter may be re-emitted later on. But a black hole, if it could re-emit this matter, would not even give up the same particles: what it would emit would be completely different particles, like a co-opted and TWISTED view of what it formerly was. The history and nature of the matter a black hole devours is lost forever. Observing and studying a black hole will tell you nothing about is history. One might be tempted to say it has its secrets locked inside the forever unobservable event horizon, but this would be incorrect, because the black hole has destroyed these secrets themselves. The only information not lost in a black hole is the bare mass-energy of what it has devoured. A black hole has no history that can be read or analyzed, and it destroys the histories and distinguishing characteristics of whatever matter falls into it forever, unlike stars.
Inside a black hole, at its very center, is a place of infinite density and space-time curvature. This is known as the black hole's singularity. There the laws of physics as known to us break down. The mathematician Roger Penrose has invented a law about this he calls his law of "cosmic CENSORSHIP." What is inside a black hole - this singularity - is "decently" hidden from the rest of the cosmos and observers in it by the hole's event horizon, which we cannot see beyond. We can know nothing beyond the event horizon except the black hole's mass and whether it is revolving or not. The singularity's existence inside the event horizon does not disturb the laws of physics on this side of the membrane - though it does not protect someone from falling into the hole who gets too close to it! If someone fell in, and you could listen to a radio transmission of his voice as he did so, it would seem like it took longer and longer for him to say anything - the lengths of times of his words and the time between his words would keep slowing down. At first his speech would lose the "allegro" quality evident in the speech of people who are spirited, alive, and know what they are talking about. His speech would slow up as he became part of the black hole, like the speech of someone guarded or posturing, and then finally, as the doomed astronaut fell into the event horizon, his utterances would freeze at a single tone, in the middle of some word he thought important enough to use before he got devoured. There is no communication possible between what is beyond the black hole's event horizon and what is is our cosmos - observation is impossible or "forbidden." This is reminiscent of a Klippoth, who hides his inner self beyond the strongest and most impenetrable of barriers. "Communication problems" are all to familiar to people who have had to have dealings with Klippoths. Your feelings, thoughts and "mind" may be an open book; you may offer the Klippoth the greatest of intimacies, but he will not reciprocate, and observation and reckoning of his inner life is virtually impossible.
While black holes do not change the laws of physics in the universe outside their event horizon, their intense gravity makes their existence known like greatly looming presences. Also, the destruction of matter as matter falls into a black hole and gets torn apart can produce very great amounts of energy equal to or exceeding that of a large star or even an entire galaxy of stars, so black holes may SEEM to shine with the best of them! Stephen Hawking discovered that the scenario of a black hole emitting nothing on its own needed adjustment. "Black holes ain't so black," he once said, because - believe it or not - they actually very begrudingly and slowly reradiate the matter they have devoured in particulate dribs and drabs which do not really come from inside the black hole, like what a star radiates, but from the nearly empty space at the hole's event horizon, where particles and anti-particles form. So don't try to accuse a black hole of being totally selfish and non-productive. You will be wrong! They mimic, in a pathetically anemic way, the magnificence of stellar radiation. When a physicist and mathematician named Chandrasekhar first developed the idea of a black hole resulting from the gravitational collapse of stars, even brilliant people who had studied stars, like Eddington, thought it impossible. Such things could just not be. Chandrasekhar got so discouraged, even by his OPEN-minded colleagues, that he just dropped the subject after a while, and when on to study more familiar celestial very large objects, like star clusters. It was not until about forty-five years later, from 1928 to 1983, that he finally was awarded a Nobel Prize, largely for his theory of gravitational collapse. These impossible things really are! And like all things in the above, they have correspondences in the below.
The sun shines warmth upon life on Earth and causes life to grow and enhance in a Web of Life. The black hole could only destroy this all. The sun ENLIGHTENS. Black holes not only do not enlighten, but information given to them (the people) that could enlighten others is destroyed, twisted, lost.
Black holes could be described as clinging, but this would be a wrong comparison. They do not cling unless you get close enough to them. Clingers are more like unwanted planets trying to shove their way into an established solar system by trying to "cling" to a star that doesn't want them around. Clingers (the people) often do share things back as a means of getting into orbit around "the star."
Since 1989 I've been in touch with primarily COSsers and then others, in groups or unaffiliated, friendly toward COS and some very hostile to the COS. The tendency for such people into Satanism (but generationally Christians) to come on "strong" by writing in a sneering tone and posturing as authorities is very big in this scene. Such of these I've STEPPED on, often pretty strong, by tearing what they were pontificating on to shreads. Many of these people, however, had sincere things to say and much to share, like sunshine emanating from within themselves, they shined forth and often considered what they shined about to be "just normal stuff, no big deal." Herein, I refer to the Inner Flame. It shines forth from them like Eros because they HAVE it! They were intact animals and it was this type every time that had a "knack" for understanding and being able to FEEL Satanic things: the main "thing" being that force in their own flesh all the time, or at least SOME of the time. Those "some of the time types" got to explain just what it felt like to NOT have this, to "GO NUMB." This type also understood a glimmer of what "klippoth" meant. They'd GET that way. None of this type looked at this as any kind of "moral" judgement but more like an ILLNESS (which it is!).
My experience with these people, thru these years, is that they SHARE things back. EVERY SINGLE ONE of them did this. Others mailed articles on things I never saw, or fanzines (mythos or other). EVERY SINGLE ONE. Except two.
One was the leader of a group that bounced from place to place. When he asked me, BEGGED ME (offering me his right arm) for something, I simply gave it to him: it was no trouble to xerox it. Many things passed from me to him in this way. Then once I BEGGED HIM to find out something for me: the name of a techno or disco group in Australia that is both white and aborigine and which used aborigine music to the beat. There was no way on earth for me to get it and I did check all over here to find out who they were. Did this person do this ONE THING I asked him to do? NO. KNOWING that someone with a FULL WELL OF WATER wants something badly, they WITHHOLD IT so the other can "feel the thirst" which THEY THEMSELVES have inside them: THIRST, HUNGER, NEVER quenched save by FANTASY which leads them down the tunnel called NON-BEING. When the person is inside that sucking vortex, then he derives PLEASURE from "torturing flies" which, indeed, he did do which caused me to RECOGNIZE him as a Black Hole and TRASH him. Not his group. JUST HIM. This is a person BECOMING a black hole: becoming. Like the literal star in gravitational collapse that BECOMES black hole, such people BECOME black holes but prior to this, they go thru stages.
The other was a woman who exploded (nova-like) into the Satanic scene with a very large sounding name which implied lots of people, even Professors. She sat in judgement of people (personal) and never even bothered to read the DOCTRINES of the groups she pontificated about. She'd woefully misunderstand the simplest things anyone in COS wrote as if a school marm with her red pen in hand all ready to JUMP on any error (read: not COMPLETELY politically perfect as so judged by this twisted woman in her OWN kind of FASCIST mind-set). Such a mindset was thrown back AT her by me. Did she dare look in the mirror? NO! She instead made excuses. Now I tend to go over things too with my own red pen: is what is being said TRUE AND REAL or is it xtoid rubbish? Nothing personal involved. She never ONCE got a clue to the mystery that is her SELF. I smoothed things over for this woman and a COS member, a planet wobbling a tad off course, and what did she do? She tried to pull him past her event horizon. Happily he got back in orbit around the Sun with his feet back on planet Earth. He was a nice person. WHY NOT help? I grew up in a society where mutual enhancement always occurred. WE are highly SOCIAL animals, we generationals. But we are NOT this way to BLACK HOLES after we realize the person is and always was a BLACK HOLE.
You see, I never asked anyone else to share things. BUT THEY DID IT because they THOUGHT OF doing it in the same spirit of SHARING I grew up with, just like plants don't have to ASK the sun to shine. By such, new things are known (new musics, things never heard before) and by such, FUN is enhanced. Ideas are spawned. Even thru a conflict with Nemo, something was born: Phil's article on Plato and Pythagoras considered by some to be a LANDMARK article. No one had to TELL ANYONE this. It's what's INSIDE them that SHINES OUT like sunshine that made them THINK OF sharing things back. The word we use for TBF's incredibly accurate epithet "Black Hole" is BARREN. Barren people HAVE nothing to share from inside themselves. They do not CREATE. They are NO LONGER animals. Neither are clingers, but clingers are at the point where they try to share YOUR animal "force" (the Flame shining forth from you). They cannot share it; in truth, they are becoming black holes and therefore can only SUCK the Light from you: just like a black hole pulls light down its drain.
Is a Black Hole the same as a psychic vampire? NO! The psychic vampire is highly visible, constantly trying to pull "games" on you like "guilt trips" and other games that works on his own kind. They CLING. Phil wrote about it in Loner and Klippoth clear enough. They aren't Black Holes. A Black Hole person is THE SAME as the literal Black Hole. They don't have anything TO give back, there is nothing INSIDE them TO share, and they do not even "recycle" or regurgitate information or input they receive from others, which they are always soliciting and "devouring." Instead, just like a black hole, they withhold it forever from the rest of the cosmos, from which they have seceded. Or, once again just like a black hole, they may let dribs and drabs of what they have devoured leak back into the cosmos, evaporate slowly back into it, as it were, but it comes back grudingly and in a completely altered form, distorted from the form it had when it when in, so that it is unrecognizable as what it once was, so distorted has it become. They can pretend to share "personal information" but this amounts to an empty basket, a nothingness not WORTH anything at all. They are as barren as any black hole - the total opposite of a unique, creative, effusive, outpouring star. (Pun intended: Star as in pentacle which represents inner Health and Vital Life.)
Psychic vampires or clingers definitely do share things with you and they usually take special care to FIND OUT just what it is you WANT so they can give it to you and "get in." They do this because they want to get CLOSE; close enough to be able to share the water that springs from your inner well, or plant their roots down in your garden, go into orbit around you like an unwanted foreign planet. SHARE YOUR FLAME is what I mean. Most XIAN-white relationships are JUST THIS. The Black Hole doesn't do this. But Black Holes tend to WANT WANT WANT more and more information, often repeat playbacks of information already given. Then it languishes, gets laid around, grows stagnant in what APPEARS TO BE chaos (i.e., a MESS all over the place) and eventually gets lost. (I think the problem with Tos and the notion of chaos is that they do not grasp the scientific reality of this as CAUSING GREATER ORDER but see it in the way I am speaking of it here, in the "commen sense" of the word.) It never gets circulated, embellished, nor is it ever allowed to evolve in others' minds. It is hard, for instance, to tell a clinger from just a regular person trying to make friends. We know them by the FEEL of it, as Hicks explained. No one I ever knew was EVER fooled by psychic vampire types. But Black Holes are another matter. (Unintentional pun here but it fits: "they are of strange flesh," said of klippoths.) Like the literal thing, they are hidden in a way. But there seems to be a lot of energy pouring out from their direction just as a star generates great amounts of energy, and a black hole mimics this by tearing matter up as it infalls into the hole, thereby producing vast amounts of energy that is not actually coming from the hole, as it really does come from the star. Information keeps POURING down the route to the black hole. It is only later you learn that this person never did anything WITH this information. The male version of black hole wasn't this way with information; he'd pick and choose what he wanted to "feel good" about from stuff and then misuse it. No matter. That's not black hole behavior: that's POLITICS. With Marxism or Naziism, the political and written dogma of the groups bears little or NO resemblence to the realities of life over there. Communism became Monarchy with Stalin as "father/teacher," which is what I mean when I say "they need The Male Head to THINK for them." Naziism became the Cult of Martyrs and Crusaders who also needed The Male Head to think for them. That male head turned out to be another black hole that near dragged Germany down the vortex with him. The problem didn't lay with the philosophies of these groups. The problem lay with the MATERIAL (the people there) they had to work with: damaged goods. Damaged material produces a house that can't stand.
Black Holes are people who don't shine. They BOOM into the arena and their gravity is definitely felt, but they do not SHINE. There are no sharing rays that come off them or from within them, as from a star, no warmth like the MOTHER SUN. The vast amounts of energy produced by the infalling matter or information is quickly dissipated when the flow route to them stops, for then the black hole has cosumed it, and it is lost to the cosmos. They enlighten NOTHING. They just suck it all down into a vortex of oblivion. Then they keep getting MORE, MORE. The only thing that seems to power them is gravity, which is what powers stars also, but a black hole, converts everything it touches and receives into one thing only - gravity - and is incapable of converting anything it receives into anything else, unlike a star, which radiates a cornucopia of things.
Gravity powers the sun and planets orbit suns and suns SHINE RAYS on the planets and MAKE LIFE to THRIVE. I once explained what sharing or Eros was to the female black hole who certainly had enough music she liked from me to GRASP the concept in the concrete form. She seemed to understand it clearly. But if she has NO ABILITY (and she does not) to be INSIDE HER OWN carnal reality and KNOW things that way, then she can't understand anything of LIFE. Perhaps a black hole pulls itself down its own vortex? No one knows. The space surely is curved, or tied in knots tight enough, and convoluted enough for them to perhaps do this. This might be what is happening at the dark heart of the black hole, at its core, the "singularity," where spacetime is infintely curved in on itself. These people live or mentally dwell in a kind of vacuum wherein there is no cause and effect tieing things together, which is the basic idea behind all physical law in the cosmos, laws which are interrupted and do not prevail in the singularity (black hole). Perhaps cause and effect would also be twisted backwards and inside out in a literal black hole. After all, not just light gets sucked down the drain, time and space gets sucked too. People who are like black holes live in a mental world wherein everything - all ideas and notions and feelings - just freely drift next to one anther, united, if at all, only by their own psychological associations. In a carnal being who hates his father, the idea of father and the feelings of hate are tied together by cause and effect, and the individual knows this. He knows how one causes and reciprocally interacts with the other, like in Newton's Third Law. In such a carnal person, there is action and reaction between idea of father and feeling of hate. But not so with a black hole type individual who hates his father. In the black hole type, the feelings of hate and the idea of father are just there, floating side by side like meaningless, unconnected contents of consciousness without interaction, causal link, or action-reaction on one another. Others may notice a link, but the black hole knows and feels none, is aware of none, having destroyed all information in his own memory that could connect the two.
In actuality, the reality of a black hole is an awesome thing to contemplate and much of what goes on past the event horizon IS unknown, at least to astrophysicists. The reality of an allegorical black hole (person) is not awesome, not funny, not amusing. But it is utterly bizarre to a carnal person, and even contemporary physicists still regard astrophysical black holes as very bizarre things, much more bizarre (to them) than even theoretical particles that can travel backward in time! What we are looking at is a thoroughly broken and barren animal no longer capable of even being the kind of animal it is and apparently doomed to remain clueless about their own condition. The only thing one can do, after realizing this about a person, is expose it, shine sunlight on it, primarily for THEMSELVES to look at.
The first time I ever saw the expression used to refer to barren people was by Gilmore in a letter to me. I had no idea what he meant and my mode of communication back then was hampered by a HUGE cultural gulf wherein I tended to slip into code-talk which was NORMAL for us. I remember vaguely that I wrote back on some Tani tangent about literal black holes and how they are "really like" the Asat (NOT-Being) and blah blah with explanations that they probably looked at and wondered "where is THIS coming from?" I remember the time I defined this Asat-thing to a physicist and he smiled and said, "You are pretty accurately defining what a black hole is and how one is formed." (I think I said, "HUH?") I didn't talk about "critical radius." I spoke of it as "matter compacting to a state of almost-solidity, a "forbidden state" of matter, which would cause the curved space/time to BREAK and then SHOOOOOOOP suck ITSELF into an infinitesimal point and form a vortex." Interesting metaphor: suck itself, similar to perpetual navel gazing. It almost seems a slander of "what is" in the Cosmos (which is marvelous) to compare the literal thing to the klippoths. As a finality I can say that literal black holes are natural phenomena. But klippoths? There is nothing natural about them. We have doctrines on such as are now called "black holes" by physicists. We maintain that all the "many" black holes are but ONE Black Hole, the Asat itself. They merely APPEAR TO BE many and in different places and occurring (becoming) at different times. I really don't think that's physics (yet?) You'd not come to that notion by seeing the black holes as "before and after" and related to the stars "they used to be," which is how physics still thinks of black holes. Remember, TIME gets obliterated as well as space (location) in a black hole. "OH MY Satan! What a THING that is."